ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016
Animal-microbe interactions and the evolution of nervous systems.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Entomophthovirus: an insect-derived iflavirus that infects a behavior-manipulating fungal pathogen of dipterans.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Stochastic variation in gut bacterial community affects reproductive rates in the water flea Daphnia magna.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2022Article
- The microbiome impacts host hybridization and speciation.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Microbial occurrence in liquid nitrogen storage tanks: a challenge for cryobanking?Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Microorganisms Associated with Mosquito Oviposition Sites: Implications for Habitat Selection and Insect Life Histories.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- An Interesting Molecule: γ-Aminobutyric Acid. What Can We Learn from Hydra Polyps?Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Intestinal bacteria modulate the foraging behavior of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae).PloS one · 2019Article
- Convergent shifts in host-associated microbial communities across environmentally elicited phenotypes.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Co-niche construction between hosts and symbionts: ideas and evidence.Journal of genetics · 2017Review
- The Hologenome Across Environments and the Implications of a Host-Associated Microbial Repertoire.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- The Intra-Dependence of Viruses and the Holobiont.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Article
- Introduction to 'Homology and convergence in nervous system evolution'.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Transitioning from Microbiome Composition to Microbial Community Interactions: The Potential of the MetaorganismFrontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animals ubiquitously interact with environmental and symbiotic microbes, and the effects of these interactions on animal physiology are currently the subject of intense interest. Nevertheless, the influence of microbes on nervous system evolution has been largely ignored. We illustrate here how taking microbes into account might enrich our ideas about the evolution of nervous systems. For example, microbes are involved in animals' communicative, defensive, predatory and dispersal behaviours, and have likely influenced the evolution of chemo- and photosensory systems. In addition, we speculate that the need to regulate interactions with microbes at the epithelial surface may have contributed to the evolutionary internalization of the nervous system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.