ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016
Independent origins of neurons and synapses: insights from ctenophores.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical multiplexing in the nervous system: molecular architecture, functional stratification, and pathophysiological plasticity of neuropeptide-classical neurotransmitter cotransmission.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Review
- The evolutionary origins of synaptic proteins and their changing roles in different organisms across evolution.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Beyond synapses: cytoplasmic connections in brain function and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- Article
- Evolution of Oligodendroglia and Myelin.Advances in neurobiology · 2025Review
- Making Neurobots and Chimerical Ctenophores.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Dynamics of neural activity in early nervous system evolution.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2024Article
- Mint/X11 PDZ domains from non-bilaterian animals recognize and bind CaScientific reports · 2024Article
- Conserved Genes in Highly Regenerative Metazoans Are Associated with Planarian Regeneration.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Parallel gene size and isoform expansion of ancient neuronal genes.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Parallel Evolution of Transcription Factors in Basal Metazoans.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Ocean to Tree: Leveraging Single-Molecule RNA-Seq to Repair Genome Gene Models and Improve Phylogenomic Analysis of Gene and Species Evolution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- General Pathophysiology of Microglia.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Parallel evolution of gravity sensing.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Chemical cognition: chemoconnectomics and convergent evolution of integrative systems in animals.Animal cognition · 2023Article
- Electrical synapse structure requires distinct isoforms of a postsynaptic scaffold.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Nitric oxide suppresses cilia activity in ctenophores.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Syncytial nerve net in a ctenophore adds insights on the evolution of nervous systems.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Independent Innexin Radiation Shaped Signaling in Ctenophores.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Exaptation and Evolutionary Adaptation in Nociceptor Mechanisms Driving Persistent Pain.Brain, behavior and evolution · 2023Review
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is more than one way to develop neuronal complexity, and animals frequently use different molecular toolkits to achieve similar functional outcomes. Genomics and metabolomics data from basal metazoans suggest that neural signalling evolved independently in ctenophores and cnidarians/bilaterians. This polygenesis hypothesis explains the lack of pan-neuronal and pan-synaptic genes across metazoans, including remarkable examples of lineage-specific evolution of neurogenic and signalling molecules as well as synaptic components. Sponges and placozoans are two lineages without neural and muscular systems. The possibility of secondary loss of neurons and synapses in the Porifera/Placozoa clades is a highly unlikely and less parsimonious scenario. We conclude that acetylcholine, serotonin, histamine, dopamine, octopamine and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) were recruited as transmitters in the neural systems in cnidarian and bilaterian lineages. By contrast, ctenophores independently evolved numerous secretory peptides, indicating extensive adaptations within the clade and suggesting that early neural systems might be peptidergic. Comparative analysis of glutamate signalling also shows numerous lineage-specific innovations, implying the extensive use of this ubiquitous metabolite and intercellular messenger over the course of convergent and parallel evolution of mechanisms of intercellular communication. Therefore: (i) we view a neuron as a functional character but not a genetic character, and (ii) any given neural system cannot be considered as a single character because it is composed of different cell lineages with distinct genealogies, origins and evolutionary histories. Thus, when reconstructing the evolution of nervous systems, we ought to start with the identification of particular cell lineages by establishing distant neural homologies or examples of convergent evolution. In a corollary of the hypothesis of the independent origins of neurons, our analyses suggest that both electrical and chemical synapses evolved more than once.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.