Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26598663›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Nanotechnologies for biomedical science and translational medicine.

James R Heath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Nanoparticulation of Prodrug into Medicines for Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Maternal Engineered Nanomaterial Inhalation During Gestation Disrupts Vascular Kisspeptin Reactivity.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

James R HeathDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 heath@caltech.edu.

Funding

QUANTITATIVE IMAGE ANALYSIS SPECIALIZED RESOURCE COREU54CA119347 · NCI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WITTE, OWEN N. · 2005 to 2009
$17.8M
Repurposing of cancer therapeutics for treatment of patients with COVID-19 diseaseU54CA199090 · NCI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI HEATH, JAMES R., RIBAS, ANTONI · 2015 to 2020
$11.4M
Strategies for Distinguishing Success in Immunotherapy Treatments (PQ20)R01CA170689 · NCI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HEATH, JAMES R., RIBAS, ANTONI · 2012 to 2015
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA170689NCI NIH HHS 5U54 CA119347NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170689NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119347NCI NIH HHS U54 CA199090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2000 the United States launched the National Nanotechnology Initiative and, along with it, a well-defined set of goals for nanomedicine. This Perspective looks back at the progress made toward those goals, within the context of the changing landscape in biomedicine that has occurred over the past 15 years, and considers advances that are likely to occur during the next decade. In particular, nanotechnologies for health-related genomics and single-cell biology, inorganic and organic nanoparticles for biomedicine, and wearable nanotechnologies for wellness monitoring are briefly covered.

Indexed as

NanomedicineNanotechnologyTranslational Research, BiomedicalDrug Delivery SystemsGenomicsHumansNanoparticlesSingle-Cell Analysisbiotechnologynanomedicinenanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID26598663
PMCPMC4664315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.