ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015
Advancing biomedical imaging.
Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced methods of wearable ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging devices: A review.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Hepatic stellate cells in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: mechanisms of fibrogenesis, plasticity, and fibrosis reversal.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- Dual-frequency fiber-array photoacoustic computed tomography for high-resolution deep brain imaging.Light, science & applications · 2026Article
- Decoupling Detection and Classification to Improve Morphological Phenotype Analysis of Sickle Red Blood Cells in Full-Scope Microscopy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Manifold-based learning for high-throughput single-peanut phenotyping.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Computational Resolution Enhancement of Mitochondria monitoring in Multiple Organs using Intravital Two-Photon Microscopy.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- In-context adaptation of VLMs for few-shot cell detection in optical microscopy.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Nanocrystal Compressive Residual Stresses: A Strategy to Strengthen the Bony Spines of Osteocytic and Anosteocytic Fish.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- All-optical optoacoustics for clinical diagnostics.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogen: Role in Biopsy for Precision Medicine.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Challenges and advances in two-dimensional photoacoustic computed tomography: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Shedding light on ultrasound in action: Optical and optoacoustic monitoring of ultrasound brain interventions.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024Review
- Deep learning to overcome Zernike phase-contrast nanoCT artifacts for automated micro-nano porosity segmentation in bone.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2024Article
- Quantitative Raman chemical imaging of intracellular drug-membrane aggregates and small molecule drug precipitates in cytoplasmic organelles.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023Review
- Review
- New Challenges for Anatomists in the Era of Omics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Deep optoacoustic localization microangiography of ischemic stroke in mice.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Polymer-Based Nanostructures for Pancreatic Beta-Cell Imaging and Non-Invasive Treatment of Diabetes.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Contribution of Intravital Neuroimaging to Study Animal Models of Multiple Sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Review
- Radiology 2040.Radiology · 2023Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Imaging reveals complex structures and dynamic interactive processes, located deep inside the body, that are otherwise difficult to decipher. Numerous imaging modalities harness every last inch of the energy spectrum. Clinical modalities include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and light-based methods [endoscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT)]. Research modalities include various light microscopy techniques (confocal, multiphoton, total internal reflection, superresolution fluorescence microscopy), electron microscopy, mass spectrometry imaging, fluorescence tomography, bioluminescence, variations of OCT, and optoacoustic imaging, among a few others. Although clinical imaging and research microscopy are often isolated from one another, we argue that their combination and integration is not only informative but also essential to discovering new biology and interpreting clinical datasets in which signals invariably originate from hundreds to thousands of cells per voxel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.