Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26598502›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2015

Hiding the tobacco power wall reduces cigarette smoking risk in adolescents: using an experimental convenience store to assess tobacco regulatory options at retail point-of-sale.

William G Shadel, Steven C Martino, Claude M Setodji, Deborah M Scharf, Daniela Kusuke, Angela Sicker, Min Gong

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04279483 (Geo Smoking Study and Neural and Geospatial Examination of Smokers' Exposure to Retail Environments), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04279483 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Geo Smoking Study and Neural and Geospatial Examination of Smokers' Exposure to Retail Environments

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2019 to 2024Enrolled343ConditionsSmoking, Tobacco, Smoking, Smoking, CigaretteArmsTobacco retailer, Non-tobacco retailer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Health Warnings and Beverage Purchase Behavior: Mediators of Impact.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Effect of plain cigarette packaging on point-of-sale purchasing behavior among young adults who smoke.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Measuring susceptibility to use tobacco in an increasingly complex consumer marketplace: How many questions do we really need?Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William G ShadelRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Steven C MartinoRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Claude M SetodjiRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Deborah M ScharfRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniela KusukeRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Angela SickerRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Min GongRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Reducing the Effect of Tobacco Powerwall Displays at Retail Point-Of-SaleR01CA175209 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI SHADEL, WILLIAM G · 2013 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis experiment tested whether changing the location or visibility of the tobacco power wall in a life sized replica of a convenience store had any effect on adolescents' susceptibility to future cigarette smoking.

methodsThe study was conducted in the RAND StoreLab (RSL), a life sized replica of a convenience store that was developed to experimentally evaluate how changing aspects of tobacco advertising displays in retail point-of-sale environments influences tobacco use risk and behaviour. A randomised, between-subjects experimental design with three conditions that varied the location or visibility of the tobacco power wall within the RSL was used. The conditions were: cashier (the tobacco power wall was located in its typical position behind the cash register counter); sidewall (the tobacco power wall was located on a sidewall away from the cash register); or hidden (the tobacco power wall was located behind the cashier but was hidden behind an opaque wall). The sample included 241 adolescents.

resultsHiding the tobacco power wall significantly reduced adolescents' susceptibility to future cigarette smoking compared to leaving it exposed (ie, the cashier condition; p=0.02). Locating the tobacco power wall on a sidewall away from the cashier had no effect on future cigarette smoking susceptibility compared to the cashier condition (p=0.80).

conclusionsHiding the tobacco power wall at retail point-of-sale locations is a strong regulatory option for reducing the impact of the retail environment on cigarette smoking risk in adolescents.

Indexed as

Advertising and PromotionDenormalizationPrevention

Identifiers

PMID26598502
PMCPMC4877296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.