Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26598084›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2015

Effects of estrogen on functional and neurological recovery after spinal cord injury: An experimental study with rats.

Olavo Biraghi Letaif, Alexandre Fogaça Cristante, Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa de Barros Filho, Ricardo Ferreira, Gustavo Bispo dos Santos, Ivan Dias da Rocha, Raphael Martus Marcon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Time-to-treatment window and cross-sex potential of βToxicology and applied pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hormonal therapy in traumatic spinal cord injury.American journal of translational research · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olavo Biraghi LetaifHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Alexandre Fogaça CristanteHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa de Barros FilhoHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Ricardo FerreiraHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gustavo Bispo dos SantosHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Ivan Dias da RochaHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Raphael Martus MarconHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the functional and histological effects of estrogen as a neuroprotective agent after a standard experimentally induced spinal cord lesion.

methodsIn this experimental study, 20 male Wistar rats were divided into two groups: one group with rats undergoing spinal cord injury (SCI) at T10 and receiving estrogen therapy with 17-beta estradiol (4mg/kg) immediately following the injury and after the placement of skin sutures and a control group with rats only subjected to SCI. A moderate standard experimentally induced SCI was produced using a computerized device that dropped a weight on the rat's spine from a height of 12.5 mm. Functional recovery was verified with the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan scale on the 2nd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th, 35th and 42nd days after injury and by quantifying the motor-evoked potential on the 42nd day after injury. Histopathological evaluation of the SCI area was performed after euthanasia on the 42nd day.

resultsThe experimental group showed a significantly greater functional improvement from the 28th to the 42nd day of observation compared to the control group. The experimental group showed statistically significant improvements in the motor-evoked potential compared with the control group. The results of pathological histomorphometry evaluations showed a better neurological recovery in the experimental group, with respect to the proportion and diameter of the quantified nerve fibers.

conclusionsEstrogen administration provided benefits in neurological and functional motor recovery in rats with SCI beginning at the 28th day after injury.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsEstrogensEvoked Potentials, MotorMaleNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsRats, WistarRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesStatistics, NonparametricTime FactorsEstrogensNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID26598084
PMCPMC4602386
OpenAlexW2259260835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.