Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26597866›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Diffusion of anti-VEGF injections in the Portuguese National Health System.

Ana Patrícia Marques, António Filipe Macedo, Julian Perelman, Pedro Aguiar, Amândio Rocha-Sousa, Rui Santana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Perceived stress levels among patients treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration with anti-VEGF injections.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Patrícia MarquesEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
António Filipe MacedoVision Rehabilitation Lab, Departamento/Centro de Física, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Julian PerelmanCentro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP), Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Pedro AguiarCentro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP), Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Amândio Rocha-SousaDepartamento de Órgãos dos Sentidos, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, Portugal.
Rui SantanaCentro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP), Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyse the temporal and geographical diffusion of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) interventions, and its determinants in a National Health System (NHS).

settingNHS Portuguese hospitals.

participantsAll inpatient and day cases related to eye diseases at all Portuguese public hospitals for the period 2002-2012 were selected on the basis of four International Classification of Diseases 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for procedures: 1474, 1475, 1479 and 149. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured anti-VEGF treatment rates by year and county. The determinants of the geographical diffusion were investigated using generalised linear modelling.

resultsWe analysed all hospital discharges from all NHS hospitals in Portugal (98,408 hospital discharges corresponding to 57,984 patients). National rates of hospitals episodes for the codes for procedures used were low before anti-VEGF approval in 2007 (less than 12% of hospital discharges). Between 2007 and 2012, the rates of hospital episodes related to the introduction of anti-VEGF injections increased by 27% per year. Patients from areas without ophthalmology departments received fewer treatments than those from areas with ophthalmology departments. The availability of an ophthalmology department in the county increased the rates of hospital episodes by 243%, and a 100-persons greater density per km(2) raised the rates by 11%.

conclusionsOur study shows a large but unequal diffusion of anti-VEGF treatments despite the universal coverage and very low copayments. The technological innovation in ophthalmology may thus produce unexpected inequalities related to financial constraints unless the implementation of innovative techniques is planned and regulated.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealthcare DisparitiesHumansInjectionsLongitudinal StudiesMacular DegenerationMiddle AgedPortugalVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTOPHTHALMOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID26597866
PMCPMC4663428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.