Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26597794›Full record

ArticleAlcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)2016

Alcohol Marketing on Twitter and Instagram: Evidence of Directly Advertising to Youth/Adolescents.

Adam E Barry, Austin M Bates, Olufunto Olusanya, Cystal E Vinal, Emily Martin, Janiene E Peoples, Zachary A Jackson, Shanaisa A Billinger, Aishatu Yusuf, Daunte A Cauley and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of food, beverage, and alcohol brand marketing on consumptive behaviors and health in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Exposure to Digital Alcohol Marketing and Alcohol Use: A Systematic Review.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Exposure to Alcohol-Related Content on Social-Media.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adam E BarryDepartment of Health & Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA aebarry@hlkn.tamu.edu.
Austin M BatesTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Olufunto OlusanyaTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Cystal E VinalTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Emily MartinTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Janiene E PeoplesTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Zachary A JacksonTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Shanaisa A BillingerTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Aishatu YusufTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Daunte A CauleyTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Javier R MontanoTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

Transdisciplinary Training in Addictions ResearchT32DA015035 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Leopoldo J Cabassa, Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg · 2002 to 2026
$5.3M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA015035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAssess whether alcohol companies restrict youth/adolescent access, interaction, and exposure to their marketing on Twitter and Instagram.

methodsEmployed five fictitious male and female Twitter (n = 10) and Instagram (n = 10) user profiles aged 13, 15, 17, 19 and/or 21. Using cellular smartphones, we determined whether profiles could (a) interact with advertising content-e.g. retweet, view video or picture content, comment, share URL; and/or (b) follow and directly receive advertising material updates from the official Instagram and Twitter pages of 22 alcohol brands for 30 days.

resultsAll user profiles could fully access, view, and interact with alcohol industry content posted on Instagram and Twitter. Twitter's age-gate, which restricts access for those under 21, successfully prevented underage profiles from following and subsequently receiving promotional material/updates. The two 21+ profiles collectively received 1836 alcohol-related tweets within 30 days. All Instagram profiles, however, were able to follow all alcohol brand pages and received an average of 362 advertisements within 30 days. The quantity of promotional updates increased throughout the week, reaching their peak on Thursday and Friday. Representatives/controllers of alcohol brand Instagram pages would respond directly to our underage user's comments.

conclusionThe alcohol industry is in violation of their proposed self-regulation guidelines for digital marketing communications on Instagram. While Twitter's age-gate effectively blocked direct to phone updates, unhindered access to post was possible. Everyday our fictitious profiles, even those as young as 13, were bombarded with alcohol industry messages and promotional material directly to their smartphones.

Indexed as

AdvertisingAlcoholic BeveragesSocial MediaAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26597794
PMCPMC10150590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.