Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26597365›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2016

Observation versus Resection for Small Asymptomatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Eran Sadot, Diane L Reidy-Lagunes, Laura H Tang, Richard Kinh Gian Do, Mithat Gonen, Michael I D'Angelica, Ronald P DeMatteo, T Peter Kingham, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Brian R Untch and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03084770 (A Prospective Evaluation of the Management of Sporadic Asymptomatic Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ≤ 2 cm), which is not on this map. Cited by 92 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03084770 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Evaluation of the Management of Sporadic Asymptomatic Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ≤ 2 cm

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2017 to 2024Enrolled1,000ConditionsNon Functioning Pancreatic Endocrine TumorArmsRadiological imaging studies, Quality of Life Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Detection of Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres via Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for the Prognostication of PanNETs and Other Neoplasms.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Article
  15. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: studying real-world outcomes.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
    Article
  16. Prospective study on stereotactic body radiotherapy for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: tolerance and effectiveness analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Developing a Predictive Model for Metastatic Potential in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eran SadotDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Diane L Reidy-LagunesDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Laura H TangDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Richard Kinh Gian DoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mithat GonenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Michael I D'AngelicaDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ronald P DeMatteoDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
T Peter KinghamDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Brian R UntchDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Murray F BrennanDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
William R JarnaginDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Peter J AllenDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. allenp@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Antibody bead array technology for diagnosis of pre-invasive pancreatic cancerR21CA158267 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ALLEN, PETER J · 2011 to 2012
$435k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R21 CA158267NCI NIH HHS R21-CA158267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the natural history of small asymptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) and to present a matched comparison between groups who underwent either initial observation or resection. Management approach for small PanNET is uncertain.

methodsIncidentally discovered, sporadic, small (<3 cm), stage I-II PanNET were analyzed retrospectively between 1993 and 2013. Diagnosis was determined either by pathology or imaging characteristics. Intention-to-treat analysis was applied.

resultsA total of 464 patients were reviewed. Observation was recommended for 104 patients (observation group), and these patients were matched to 77 patients in the resection group based on tumor size at initial imaging. The observation group was significantly older (median 63 vs. 59 years, p = 0.04) and tended towards shorter follow-up (44 vs. 57 months, p = 0.06). Within the observation group, 26 of the 104 patients (25 %) underwent subsequent tumor resection after a median observation interval of 30 months (range 7-135). At the time of last follow-up of the observation group, the median tumor size had not changed (1.2 cm, p = 0.7), and no patient had developed evidence of metastases. Within the resection group, low-grade (G1) pathology was recorded in 72 (95 %) tumors and 5 (6 %) developed a recurrence, which occurred after a median of 5.1 (range 2.9-8.1) years. No patient in either group died from disease. Death from other causes occurred in 11 of 181 (6 %) patients.

conclusionsIn this study, no patient who was initially observed developed metastases or died from disease after a median follow-up of 44 months. Observation for stable, small, incidentally discovered PanNET is reasonable in selected patients.

Indexed as

AgedCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPatient SelectionPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

PMID26597365
PMCPMC4798427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.