ArticleBMC oral health2015
Candida concentrations determined following concentrated oral rinse culture reflect clinical oral signs.
Article in BMC oral health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review on the implication of Candida in peri-implantitis.International journal of implant dentistry · 2021Pooled it
- Beneficial Effect of Olive Leaf Extract as an Adjunct to Standard Antifungal Therapy in TreatingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Trial
- Taste Dysfunction in Oral Candidiasis: Impact of Candida Carriage and Hyphal Presence.Mycoses · 2026Article
- The role of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) inJournal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Oral Colonization by Different Candida Species: First Comparative Study between Denture and Nondenture Wearers in Tunisia.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Impact of the Tobacco Heating System and Cigarette Smoking on the Oral Cavity: A Pilot Study.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
- The relation between serum levels of interleukin 10 and interferon-gamma with oral candidiasis in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Article
- Oral Cavity andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Oral Candidal Colonization in Patients with Different Prosthetic Appliances.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Relevance of OralJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Yeast-Host Interactions:Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Candida prevalence and oral hygiene due to orthodontic therapy with conventional brackets.BMC oral health · 2020Article
- Oral Candida Mannan Concentrations Correlate with Symptoms/Signs of Ill Health and the Immune Status.Mycopathologia · 2020Article
- Oral Prevalence ofInfection and drug resistance · 2020Article
- Molecular characterization of fungi causing colonization and infection in organ transplant recipients: A one-year prospective study.Current medical mycology · 2020Article
- Relationship Between the Quantity of Oral Candida and Systemic Condition/Diseases of the Host: Oral Candida Increases with Advancing Age and Anemia.Mycopathologia · 2019Article
- Reduction in Percentage of Clusters of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis Causing Candidemia in a General Hospital in Madrid, Spain.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2018Article
- The Candida species that are important for the development of atrophic glossitis in xerostomia patients.BMC oral health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral candidiasis is an infection caused by a yeast-like fungus called Candida. Various methods can be used to isolate Candida from the oral cavity. However, it is difficult to correctly and satisfactorily diagnose oral candidiasis because currently no microbiological or laboratory standards based on samples from the oral cavity are available. The aim of this study is to establish a reliable laboratory test for diagnosing oral candidiasis.
methodsOral swab, rinse and concentrated rinse samples were obtained from 200 consecutive outpatients (103 male patients and 97 female patients; mean age, 47.2 years; age range, 9-89 years). Candida colonies from cultured samples were enumerated to compare the sensitivities and specificities of the above sampling methods, and the associations between Candida detection or concentration and the clinical oral signs were examined.
resultsThe mean colony numbers were 263 ± 590 CFU/swab for the swab method, 2894 ± 6705 CFU/100 μL for the rinse method, and 9245 ± 19,030 CFU/100 μL for the concentrated rinse method. The median numbers were 23 CFU/swab for the swab method, 56 CFU/100 μL for the rinse method, and 485 CFU/100 μL for the concentrated rinse method. Candida was detected in the oral cavity of 33.5 % and 52.0 % of the outpatients by the swab method and concentrated rinse, respectively. Candida concentrations determined by the concentrated rinse were closely related to the severity of the clinical oral signs. The positive predictive values of residual root, redness of the oral mucosa, denture, glossalgia, dry mouth, and taste disorder were useful predictors of oral candidiasis.
conclusionsConcentrated rinse sampling is suitable for evaluating oral candidiasis, and Candida concentrations examined using this method strongly associated with the oral signs associated with Candida infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.