ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2016
Sedation and analgosedation performed by pediatricians--experience made with the implementation of an in-house sedation standard: Sedation and analgosedation-implemantation of an in-house standard.
Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensory nerve conduction studies in infants, children and teenagers - An update.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2024Article
- Analgosedation for diagnostic and interventional procedures: a countrywide survey of pediatric centers in Germany.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2020Article
- Bone marrow aspirations in oncological patients: experience from an in-house standard in paediatrics.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2019Article
- Propofol Versus 4-hydroxybutyric Acid in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterizations.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background(Analgo-) sedations for diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures form part of the daily clinical routine for pediatric patients. National and international medical specialist associations have published guidelines indicating the general conditions of these procedures, yet the recommendations are not always consistent. Since anesthesiological activities are increasingly performed by nonanesthesiologists at our hospital, the Pediatric Clinic of the University Hospital of Saarland considered it necessary to develop an in-house standard. MATERIAL AND
methodsOn the basis of a standard dating back to 2005, which was developed and clinically applied by two of the authors of this article, we created our "Homburg standard", taking into account the guidelines of the specialist associations and the international literature. This standard covers patient information, the consumption of food and drink, monitoring before, during and after the sedation as well as documentation. We will present the process of how our standard was established by analyzing protocols of the "old" standard-applied for a period of 18 months-and the application of our standard to two new studies performed at our hospital.
resultsIn total, 159 sedations of the 18-month reference period could be evaluated; the two studies accounted for 72 sedations for diagnostic and/or interventional cardiac catheter examinations and 40 sedations for outpatient TEE examinations. None of the procedures was associated with complications endangering the safety of a patient. Whereas the documentation of the two studies was nearly complete, it varied considerably in the case of the 159 sedations, depending on how much time had passed since the most recent training.
conclusionOur standard is a practicable and safe method of performing sedations and analgosedations in pediatric patients. In addition, this standard allows clinical studies to be carried out and evaluated, taking into account certain organizational measures. The development of a specific guideline by the DGKJ and/or the GNPI is considered desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26597217What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.