Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26597178›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2015

Acute toxicity profile of craniospinal irradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in children with medulloblastoma: A prospective analysis.

Maurice C Cox, Johannes M Kusters, Corrie E Gidding, Jolanda H Schieving, Erik J van Lindert, Johannes H Kaanders, Geert O Janssens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dynamics and predictors of hematologic toxicity during cranio-spinal irradiation.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hair disorders in cancer survivors.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2019
    Review
  11. Hair disorders in patients with cancer.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maurice C CoxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. mauricecox94@gmail.com.
Johannes M KustersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. martijn.kusters@radboudumc.nl.
Corrie E GiddingDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. corrie.gidding@radboudumc.nl.
Jolanda H SchievingDepartment of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. jolanda.schieving@radboudumc.nl.
Erik J van LindertDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. erik.vanlindert@radboudumc.nl.
Johannes H KaandersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. j.kaanders@radboudumc.nl.
Geert O JanssensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, 3584, CX, The Netherlands. g.o.r.janssens@umcutrecht.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo report on the acute toxicity in children with medulloblastoma undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with daily intrafractionally modulated junctions.

methodsNewly diagnosed patients, aged 3-21, with standard-risk (SR) or high-risk (HR) medulloblastoma were eligible. A dose of 23.4 or 36.0 Gy in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy was prescribed to the craniospinal axis, followed by a boost to the primary tumor bed (54 or 55.8 Gy) and metastases (39.6-55.8 Gy), when indicated. Weekly, an intravenous bolus of vincristine was combined for patients with SR medulloblastoma and patients participating in the COG-ACNS-0332 study. Common toxicity criteria (CTC, version 2.0) focusing on skin, alopecia, voice changes, conjunctivitis, anorexia, dysphagia, gastro-intestinal symptoms, headache, fatigue and hematological changes were scored weekly during radiotherapy.

resultsFrom 2010 to 2014, data from 15 consecutive patients (SR, n = 7; HR, n = 8) were collected. Within 72 h from onset of treatment, vomiting (66 %) and headache (46 %) occurred. During week 3 of treatment, a peak incidence in constipation (33 %) and abdominal pain/cramping (40 %) was observed, but only in the subgroup of patients (n = 9) receiving vincristine (constipation: 56 vs 0 %, P = .04; pain/cramping: 67 vs 0 %, P = .03). At week 6, 73 % of the patients developed faint erythema of the cranial skin with dry desquamation (40 %) or moist desquamation confined to the skin folds of the auricle (33 %). No reaction of the skin overlying the spinal target volume was observed.

conclusionsHeadache at onset and gastro-intestinal toxicity, especially in patients receiving weekly vincristine, were the major complaints of patients with medulloblastoma undergoing craniospinal irradiation with IMRT.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCerebellar NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyChildChild, PreschoolCraniospinal IrradiationFemaleHumansMaleMedulloblastomaProspective StudiesRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedVincristineYoung AdultAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicVincristine

Identifiers

PMID26597178
PMCPMC4657242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.