Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26597114›Full record

ReviewChild psychiatry and human development2016

Hoarding in Children and Adolescents: A Review.

Sarah H Morris, Sara R Jaffee, Geoffrey P Goodwin, Martin E Franklin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Child psychiatry and human development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Recent Advances in Research on Hoarding.Current psychiatry reports · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah H MorrisUniversity of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. sarahmor@sas.upenn.edu.
Sara R JaffeeUniversity of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Geoffrey P GoodwinUniversity of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Martin E FranklinUniversity of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Philadelphia University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnostic conceptualization of hoarding has recently changed, and yet the application of these changes to hoarding in youth remains to be clarified. In this review we examine the literature on hoarding in youth. We discuss issues related to the assessment of pediatric hoarding, and the nature of hoarding in youth. We consider evidence for hoarding disorder as a distinct diagnosis in youth, and review the relationship between pediatric hoarding and other psychiatric disorders. Finally, we describe preliminary models of treatment for pediatric hoarding. We conclude that there is support for hoarding disorder as a distinct diagnosis in youth. However, more precise and developmentally appropriate assessment tools are needed to provide stronger evidence for this claim and to further our knowledge of prevalence and associated clinical characteristics. Although there is no evidence-based treatment for pediatric hoarding, preliminary evidence from case studies suggests that cognitive and behavioral methods may have promise.

Indexed as

HoardingAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildChild BehaviorCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansNeeds AssessmentPsychological TechniquesChildren and adolescentsCognitive behavioral therapyHoarding disorderObsessive compulsive disorder

Identifiers

PMID26597114
OpenAlexW2175856899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.