Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26596987›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2016

Hox genes, evo-devo, and the case of the ftz gene.

Leslie Pick

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome-Wide Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Shared sociogenetic basis of honey bee behavior and human risk for autism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  14. Polycomb and trithorax opposition in development and disease.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leslie PickDepartment of Entomology and Program in Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. lpick@umd.edu.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Functional evolution of segmentation gene regulatory networks in insectsR01GM113230 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Leslie Pick · 2015 to 2026
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of the broad conservation of embryonic regulatory genes across animal phyla, launched by the cloning of homeotic genes in the 1980s, was a founding event in the field of evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo). While it had long been known that fundamental cellular processes, commonly referred to as housekeeping functions, are shared by animals and plants across the planet-processes such as the storage of information in genomic DNA, transcription, translation and the machinery for these processes, universal codon usage, and metabolic enzymes-Hox genes were different: mutations in these genes caused "bizarre" homeotic transformations of insect body parts that were certainly interesting but were expected to be idiosyncratic. The isolation of the genes responsible for these bizarre phenotypes turned out to be highly conserved Hox genes that play roles in embryonic patterning throughout Metazoa. How Hox genes have changed to promote the development of diverse body plans remains a central issue of the field of evo-devo today. For this Memorial article series, I review events around the discovery of the broad evolutionary conservation of Hox genes and the impact of this discovery on the field of developmental biology. I highlight studies carried out in Walter Gehring's lab and by former lab members that have continued to push the field forward, raising new questions and forging new approaches to understand the evolution of developmental mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody PatterningDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryonic DevelopmentFushi Tarazu Transcription FactorsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, HomeoboxHomeodomain ProteinsDrosophila Proteinsftz protein, DrosophilaFushi Tarazu Transcription FactorsHomeodomain ProteinsArthropodsftzHomeotic transformationHox geneMolecular evolution

Identifiers

PMID26596987
PMCPMC4877300
OpenAlexW2181208593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.