ReviewCardiac electrophysiology clinics2015
Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Dyssynchrony and Resynchronization.
Review in Cardiac electrophysiology clinics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparative Analysis of Apical Rocking and Septal Flash: Two Views of the Same Systole?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Concepts of Cardiac Dyssynchrony and Dynamic Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- A perspective on Notch signalling in progression and arrhythmogenesis in familial hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Relationships between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block and healthy controls.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy and Cellular Bioenergetics: Effects Beyond Chamber Mechanics.European cardiology · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dyssynchronous contraction of the ventricle significantly worsens morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Approximately one-third of patients with HF have cardiac dyssynchrony and are candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The initial understanding of dyssynchrony and CRT was in terms of global mechanics and hemodynamics, but lack of clinical benefit in a sizable subgroup of recipients who appear otherwise appropriate has challenged this paradigm. This article reviews current understanding of these cellular and subcellular mechanisms, arguing that these aspects are key to improving CRT use, as well as translating its benefits to a wider HF population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.