Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26596723›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Measurement of circulating transcripts and gene cluster analysis predicts and defines therapeutic efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumors.

L Bodei, M Kidd, I M Modlin, S Severi, I Drozdov, S Nicolini, D J Kwekkeboom, E P Krenning, R P Baum, G Paganelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The efficacy ofJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Clinical Applications of Theranostics.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Circulating hsa-miR-5096 predictsFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Neuroendocrine Tumors and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: When Is the Right Time?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

L BodeiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
M KiddWren Laboratories, Branford, CT, USA.
I M ModlinLuGenIum Consortium, Milan, Rotterdam, Bad Berka, London, Italy, Netherlands, Germany, UK. imodlin@optonline.net.
S SeveriNuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
I DrozdovBering Limited, London, UK.
S NicoliniNuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
D J KwekkeboomLuGenIum Consortium, Milan, Rotterdam, Bad Berka, London, Italy, Netherlands, Germany, UK.
E P KrenningLuGenIum Consortium, Milan, Rotterdam, Bad Berka, London, Italy, Netherlands, Germany, UK.
R P BaumLuGenIum Consortium, Milan, Rotterdam, Bad Berka, London, Italy, Netherlands, Germany, UK.
G PaganelliNuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITErasmus MC · NLEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITWren Laboratories (United States) · USZentralklinik Bad Berka · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective method for treating neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). It is limited, however, in the prediction of individual tumor response and the precise and early identification of changes in tumor size. Currently, response prediction is based on somatostatin receptor expression and efficacy by morphological imaging and/or chromogranin A (CgA) measurement. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of circulating NET transcripts as a measure of PRRT efficacy, and moreover to identify prognostic gene clusters in pretreatment blood that could be interpolated with relevant clinical features in order to define a biological index for the tumor and a predictive quotient for PRRT efficacy.

methodsNET patients (n = 54), M: F 37:17, median age 66, bronchial: n = 13, GEP-NET: n = 35, CUP: n = 6 were treated with (177)Lu-based-PRRT (cumulative activity: 6.5-27.8 GBq, median 18.5). At baseline: 47/54 low-grade (G1/G2; bronchial typical/atypical), 31/49 (18)FDG positive and 39/54 progressive. Disease status was assessed by RECIST1.1. Transcripts were measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and multianalyte algorithmic analysis (NETest); CgA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Gene cluster (GC) derivations: regulatory network, protein:protein interactome analyses. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: chi-square, non-parametric measurements, multiple regression, receiver operating characteristic and Kaplan-Meier survival.

resultsThe disease control rate was 72 %. Median PFS was not achieved (follow-up: 1-33 months, median: 16). Only grading was associated with response (p < 0.01). At baseline, 94 % of patients were NETest-positive, while CgA was elevated in 59 %. NETest accurately (89 %, χ(2) = 27.4; p = 1.2 × 10(-7)) correlated with treatment response, while CgA was 24 % accurate. Gene cluster expression (growth-factor signalome and metabolome) had an AUC of 0.74 ± 0.08 (z-statistic = 2.92, p < 0.004) for predicting response (76 % accuracy). Combination with grading reached an AUC: 0.90 ± 0.07, irrespective of tumor origin. Circulating transcripts correlated accurately (94 %) with PRRT responders (SD+PR+CR; 97 %) vs. non-responders (91 %).

conclusionsBlood NET transcript levels and the predictive quotient (circulating gene clusters+grading) accurately predicted PRRT efficacy. CgA was non-informative.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorChromogranin ACluster AnalysisFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMaleMetabolomeMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotideRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, Peptide177Lu-octreotide, DOTA(0)-Tyr(3)-Biomarkers, TumorChromogranin AOctreotideRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, PeptideRNA, Messenger68Ga-PETChromograninGene transcriptsNETestNeuroendocrine tumorPRRT

Identifiers

PMID26596723
OpenAlexW2283093664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.