Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26596558›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2016

Novel adjuvant formulations for delivery of anti-tuberculosis vaccine candidates.

Else Marie Agger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nanoparticles in the Treatment of Renal Fibrosis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Liposomal delivery system/adjuvant for tuberculosis vaccine.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. COVID-19 vaccine development: What lessons can we learn from TB?Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2020
    Review
  16. Towards new TB vaccines.Seminars in immunopathology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Else Marie AggerDepartment of Infectious Disease Immunology, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. Electronic address: eag@ssi.dk.

Funding

An adjuvant that promotes TH1/TH17 and CD8 T cells in a tuberculosis vaccineR01AI105422 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FLYNN, JOANNE L. · 2013 to 2017
$5.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI105422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need for a new and improved vaccine against tuberculosis for controlling this disease that continues to pose a global health threat. The current research strategy is to replace the present BCG vaccine or boost BCG-immunity with subunit vaccines such as viral vectored- or protein-based vaccines. The use of recombinant proteins holds a number of production advantages including ease of scalability, but requires an adjuvant inducing cell-mediated immune responses. A number of promising novel adjuvant formulations have recently been designed and show evidence of induction of cellular immune responses in humans. A common trait of effective TB adjuvants including those already in current clinical testing is a two-component approach combining a delivery system with an appropriate immunomodulator. This review summarizes the status of current TB adjuvant research with a focus on the division of labor between delivery systems and immunomodulators.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicTuberculosis VaccinesBCG VaccineDrug CompoundingHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisAdjuvants, ImmunologicBCG VaccineTuberculosis VaccinesBCG boost vaccineDelivery systemsDual-component adjuvantsImmunomodulatorsLong-term memoryMucosal adjuvantsPAMPsTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID26596558
PMCPMC4870161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.