Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26596540›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychology2015

Cognitive behaviour therapy for non-cardiac pain in the chest (COPIC): a multicentre randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation.

Peter Tyrer, Helen Tyrer, Sylvia Cooper, Barbara Barrett, Stephanie Kings, Valentina Lazarevic, Kate Bransby-Adams, Katherine Whittamore, Gemma Walker, Antoinette McNulty and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter TyrerCentre for Mental Health, Imperial College, Claybrook Road, London, W6 8LN, UK. p.tyrer@imperial.ac.uk.
Helen TyrerCentre for Mental Health, Imperial College, Claybrook Road, London, W6 8LN, UK. h.tyrer@imperial.ac.uk.
Sylvia CooperCentre for Mental Health, Imperial College, Claybrook Road, London, W6 8LN, UK. s.cooper@imperial.ac.uk.
Barbara BarrettKing's Health Economics, King's College, London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. barbara.m.barrett@kcl.ac.uk.
Stephanie KingsEast Midlands Clinical Research Network, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. steph.kings@nottshc.nhs.uk.
Valentina LazarevicEast Midlands Clinical Research Network, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. valentina.lazarevic@nottshc.nhs.uk.
Kate Bransby-AdamsEast Midlands Clinical Research Network, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. kate.bransby-adams@nottshc.nhs.uk.
Katherine WhittamoreEast Midlands Clinical Research Network, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. katherine.whittamore2@nottingham.ac.uk.
Gemma WalkerEast Midlands Clinical Research Network, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. gemma.walker@nottingham.ac.uk.
Antoinette McNultyNorth West London Clinical Research Network, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0NN, UK. amcnulty1@nhs.net.
Emma DonaldsonBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Skimped Hill Lane, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 1BQ, UK. emma.donaldson@berkshire.nhs.uk.
Luke MidgleyBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Skimped Hill Lane, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 1BQ, UK. luke.midgley@berkshire.nhs.uk.
Shani McCoyBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Skimped Hill Lane, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 1BQ, UK. shani.emmons@btinternet.com.
Rachel EveredCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, Hampstead Road, London, NW1 7QY, UK. rachel.evered@gmail.com.
Min YangSchool of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. yangmin2013@scu.edu.cn.
Boliang GuoFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. boliang.guo@nottingham.ac.uk.
Yvonne Lisseman-StonesKings Mill Hospital, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 4JL, UK. yvonne.lisseman-stones@sfh-tr.nhs.uk.
Asmae DoukaniLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Health, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. asmae.doukani@lshtm.ac.uk.
Roger MulderDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Riccarton Avenue, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand. roger.mulder@otago.ac.nz.
Richard MorrissFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. richard.morriss@nottingham.ac.uk.
Mike CrawfordCentre for Mental Health, Imperial College, Claybrook Road, London, W6 8LN, UK. m.crawford@imperial.ac.uk.
Centre for Mental Health · GBBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Mental Health · GBNIHR Clinical Research Network · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBKings Mill Hospital · GBLondon Clinic · GBSichuan University · CNUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1010-23192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients with chest pain have nothing wrong with their cardiac function. Psychological forms of treatment for this condition are more likely to be successful than others. METHODS/

designA two-arm parallel controlled randomized trial of standard care versus a modified form of cognitive behaviour therapy for chest pain (CBT-CP) in patients who have attended emergency hospital services. Inclusion criteria include (i) emergency attendance more than once in the previous year with chest pain when no physical pathology has been found, (ii) aged between 16 and 75, (iii) signed consent to take part in the study. Exclusion criteria are (i) under current psychiatric care, (ii) those who have had new psychotropic drugs prescribed within the last two months, (iii) are receiving or about to receive a formal psychological treatment. Those satisfying these criteria will be randomized to 4-10 sessions of CBT-CP or to continue with standard care. Participants are randomized using a remote web-based system using permuted stacked blocks stratified by study centre. Assessment is carried out at baseline by researchers subsequently masked to allocation and at 6 months and 1 year after randomization. The primary outcome is the Health Anxiety Inventory score at 6 months, and secondary outcomes are generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms, the Lucock Health Anxiety Questionnaire adapted for chest pain, visual analogue scales for chest pain and discomfort (Inskip Scale), the Schedule for Evaluating Persistent Symptoms (SEPS), health related quality of life, social functioning and medical resource usage. Intention to treat analyses will be carried out with clinical and functioning data, and a cost-utility analysis will compare differences in total costs and differences in quality of life using QALYs derived from the EQ-5D. The data will also be linked to another parallel study in New Zealand where 126 patients with the same inclusion criteria have been treated in a similar trial; the form of analysis of the combined data has yet to be determined. DISCUSSION: The morbidity and costs of non-cardiac chest pain are substantial and if a simple psychological treatment given by health professionals working in medical departments is beneficial it should prove to be of great value. Combining data with a similar study in New Zealand is an additional asset.

trial registrationISRCTN14711101 (registered 05/03/2015).

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdolescentAdultAgedChest PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26596540
PMCPMC4657319
OpenAlexW2175738578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.