Trial reportJournal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery2015
Clinical relevance of cone beam computed tomography in mandibular third molar removal: A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02071030 (The Efficacy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Efficacy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Compared to Panoramic Radiography Prior to Third Molar Removal; a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does the addition of cone-beam CT to panoral imaging reduce inferior dental nerve injuries resulting from third molar surgery? A systematic review.BMC oral health · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT compared to panoramic radiography in predicting IAN exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Pooled it
- Panoramic versus CBCT used to reduce inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after third molar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2020Pooled it
- CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Pooled it
- Postoperative socket irrigation with drinking tap water reduces the risk of inflammatory complications following surgical removal of third molars: a multicenter randomized trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2017Trial
- Beyond the white line: a multicentre retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical predictors of inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injury following mandibular third molar surgery.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Dual Framework for Classification and Detection of Third Molar Impaction in Panoramic Radiographs.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: Approaches and Current Perspectives in Surgical Therapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Automatic Detection and Proximity Quantification of Inferior Alveolar Nerve and Mandibular Third Molar on CBCT: A Systematic Review.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- The Positional Relationship Between the Mandibular Canal and the Lower Third Molar Determined on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Optimization of the size and location of the FOVs for CBCT capture of impacted lower third molars.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
- Re-Intervention Rate, Timing, and Indications Following Coronectomy of the Mandibular Third Molar: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Is cone beam computed tomography accurate in predicting inferior alveolar nerve exposure during mandibular third molar extraction?BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Dentistry by Exploring the Potential of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Panoramic radiographic features for machine learning based detection of mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar canal contact.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Coronectomy of mandibular third molars with dental pathology: a prospective cohort study of 121 molars.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigation of the relationship between the mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve using posteroanterior radiographs: a pilot study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Is it possible to predict neurosensory alterations in impacted lower third molar removal based on preoperative imaging procedures? A prospective cohort study.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2024Article
- Association of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Position and Nerve Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aims of this study were to investigate the effectiveness of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared to panoramic radiography (PR), prior to mandibular third molar removal, in reducing patient morbidity, and to identify risk factors associated with inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis multicentre, randomised, controlled trial was performed at three centres in the Netherlands. Adults with an increased risk for IAN injury, as diagnosed from PR, were included in the study. In one arm of the study, patients underwent an additional CBCT prior to third molar surgery. In a second arm of the study, no additional radiographs were acquired. The primary outcome measure was the number of patient-reported altered sensations 1 week after surgery. As secondary outcome measures, the number of patients with objective IAN injury, with long-term (>6 months) IAN injury, the occurrence of other postoperative complications, the Oral Health Related Quality of Life-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire responses, postoperative pain (visual analogue scale score), duration of surgery, number of emergency visits, and number of missed days of work or study were scored.
resultsA total of 268 patients with 320 mandibular third molars were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The overall incidence of IAN injury 1 week after surgery was 6.3%. No significant differences between CBCT and PR for temporary IAN injury (p = 0.64) and all other secondary outcomes were registered. A lingual position of the mandibular canal (MC) and narrowing, in which the diameter of the MC lumen was decreased at the contact area between the MC and the roots, were significant risk factors for temporary IAN injury.
conclusionAlthough CBCT is a valuable diagnostic adjunct for identification of an increased risk for IAN injury, the use of CBCT does not translate into a reduction of IAN injury and other postoperative complications, after removal of the complete mandibular third molar. In these selected cases of a high risk for IAN injury, an alternative strategy, such as monitoring or a coronectomy, might be more appropriate. (http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02071030).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.