Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26596353›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Direct observation of respectful maternity care in five countries: a cross-sectional study of health facilities in East and Southern Africa.

Heather E Rosen, Pamela F Lynam, Catherine Carr, Veronica Reis, Jim Ricca, Eva S Bazant, Linda A Bartlett, Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care Study Group of the Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heather E RosenJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. heather.e.rosen@gmail.com.
Pamela F LynamJhpiego/Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. pamelaflynam@gmail.com.
Catherine CarrJhpiego/Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA. catherine.carr@jhpiego.org.
Veronica ReisJhpiego/Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique. veronica.reis@jhpiego.org.
Jim RiccaJhpiego/Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA. jim.ricca@jhpiego.org.
Eva S BazantJhpiego/Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA. eva.bazant@jhpiego.org.
Linda A BartlettJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. linda.bartlett@jhu.edu.
Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care Study Group of the Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor quality of care at health facilities is a barrier to pregnant women and their families accessing skilled care. Increasing evidence from low resource countries suggests care women receive during labor and childbirth is sometimes rude, disrespectful, abusive, and not responsive to their needs. However, little is known about how frequently women experience these behaviors. This study is one of the first to report prevalence of respectful maternity care and disrespectful and abusive behavior at facilities in multiple low resource countries.

methodsStructured, standardized clinical observation checklists were used to directly observe quality of care at facilities in five countries: Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar, Rwanda, and the United Republic of Tanzania. Respectful care was represented by 10 items describing actions the provider should take to ensure the client was informed and able to make choices about her care, and that her dignity and privacy were respected. For each country, percentage of women receiving these practices and delivery room privacy conditions were calculated. Clinical observers' open-ended comments were also analyzed to identify examples of disrespect and abuse.

resultsA total of 2164 labor and delivery observations were conducted at hospitals and health centers. Encouragingly, women overall were treated with dignity and in a supportive manner by providers, but many women experienced poor interactions with providers and were not well-informed about their care. Both physical and verbal abuse of women were observed during the study. The most frequently mentioned form of disrespect and abuse in the open-ended comments was abandonment and neglect.

conclusionsEfforts to increase use of facility-based maternity care in low income countries are unlikely to achieve desired gains if there is no improvement in quality of care provided, especially elements of respectful care. This analysis identified insufficient communication and information sharing by providers as well as delays in care and abandonment of laboring women as deficiencies in respectful care. Failure to adopt a patient-centered approach and a lack of health system resources are contributing structural factors. Further research is needed to understand these barriers and develop effective interventions to promote respectful care in this context.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDelivery, ObstetricProfessional-Patient RelationsWomen's RightsChecklistCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansKenyaMadagascarMaternal Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePovertyPregnancyRwanda

Identifiers

PMID26596353
PMCPMC4657214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.