Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26596352›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2018

The impact of covariate misclassification using generalized linear regression under covariate-adaptive randomization.

Liqiong Fan, Sharon D Yeatts, Bethany J Wolf, Leslie A McClure, Magdy Selim, Yuko Y Palesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liqiong Fan1 Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Sharon D Yeatts1 Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Bethany J Wolf1 Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Leslie A McClure2 Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Magdy Selim3 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Neurology,Division of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Boston MA, USA.
Yuko Y Palesch1 Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USDrexel University · US

Funding

Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials Network Statistical and Data ManagementU01NS059041 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DURKALSKI, VALERIE L, PALESCH, YUKO Y · 2006 to 2015
$9.1M
The ALIAS StudyU01NS054630 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PALESCH, YUKO Y · 2005 to 2010
$6.9M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS054630NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS059041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under covariate adaptive randomization, the covariate is tied to both randomization and analysis. Misclassification of such covariate will impact the intended treatment assignment; further, it is unclear what the appropriate analysis strategy should be. We explore the impact of such misclassification on the trial's statistical operating characteristics. Simulation scenarios were created based on the misclassification rate and the covariate effect on the outcome. Models including unadjusted, adjusted for the misclassified, or adjusted for the corrected covariate were compared using logistic regression for a binary outcome and Poisson regression for a count outcome. For the binary outcome using logistic regression, type I error can be maintained in the adjusted model, but the test is conservative using an unadjusted model. Power decreased with both increasing covariate effect on the outcome as well as the misclassification rate. Treatment effect estimates were biased towards the null for both the misclassified and unadjusted models. For the count outcome using a Poisson model, covariate misclassification led to inflated type I error probabilities and reduced power in the misclassified and the unadjusted model. The impact of covariate misclassification under covariate-adaptive randomization differs depending on the underlying distribution of the outcome.

Indexed as

BiasLinear ModelsRandom AllocationAlgorithmsPoisson DistributionCovariate–adaptive randomizationcovariate misclassificationgeneralized linear regression

Identifiers

PMID26596352
PMCPMC5476516
OpenAlexW2341923639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.