Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26595686›Full record

ArticlePhysiological measurement2015

Method of quantifying 3D strain distribution in skeletal muscle using cine phase contrast MRI.

Elisabeth R Jensen, Duane A Morrow, Joel P Felmlee, Naveen S Murthy, Kenton R Kaufman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological measurement, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisabeth R JensenMayo Graduate School Biomedical Engineering and Physiology Track Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Motion Analysis Laboratory Division of Orthopedic Research Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Duane A Morrow
Joel P Felmlee
Naveen S Murthy
Kenton R Kaufman

Funding

Musculoskeletal Research Training ProgramT32AR056950 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Jennifer J Westendorf · 2009 to 2026
$7.0M
MICROSENSOR FOR INTRAMUSCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENTR01HD031476 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KAUFMAN, KENTON R. · 1994 to 2014
$5.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR056950NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR56950NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD031476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intramuscular pressure (IMP), a correlate of muscle tension, may fill an important clinical testing void. A barrier to implementing this measure clinically is its non-uniform distribution, which is not fully understood. Pressure is generated by changes in fluid mass and volume, therefore 3D volumetric strain distribution may affect IMP distribution. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for quantifying 3D volumetric strain distribution in the human tibialis anterior (TA) during passive tension using cine phase contrast (CPC) MRI and to assess its accuracy and precision.Five healthy subjects each participated in three data collections. A custom MRI-compatible apparatus repeatedly rotated a subject's ankle between 0° and 26° plantarflexion while CPC MRI data were collected. Additionally, T2-weighted images of the lower leg were collected both before and after the CPC data collection with the ankle stationary at both 0° and 26° plantarflexion for TA muscle segmentation. A 3D hexahedral mesh was generated based on the TA surface before CPC data collection with the ankle at 0° plantarflexion and the node trajectories were tracked using the CPC data. The volumetric strain of each element was quantified.Three tests were employed to assess the measure accuracy and precision. First, to quantify leg position drift, the TA segmentations were compared before and after CPC data collection. The Hawsdorff distance measure (error) was 1.5  ±  0.7 mm. Second, to assess the surface node trajectory accuracy, the deformed mesh surface was compared to the TA segmented at 26° of ankle plantarflexion. This error was 0.6  ±  0.2 mm. Third, the standard deviation of volumetric strain across the three data collections was calculated for each element and subject. The median between-day variability across subjects and mesh elements was 0.06 mm3 mm(-3) (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.18 mm3 mm(-3)). Overall the results demonstrated excellent accuracy and precision.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalStress, MechanicalFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMalePressureYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26595686
PMCPMC4838532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.