Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26595461›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2016

CRISPR-Cas9-based target validation for p53-reactivating model compounds.

Michael Wanzel, Jonas B Vischedyk, Miriam P Gittler, Niklas Gremke, Julia R Seiz, Mirjam Hefter, Magdalena Noack, Rajkumar Savai, Marco Mernberger, Joël P Charles and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Current Advances in CETSA.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael WanzelInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Jonas B VischedykInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Miriam P GittlerInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Niklas GremkeInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Julia R SeizInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Mirjam HefterInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Magdalena NoackInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Rajkumar SavaiUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany.
Marco MernbergerInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Joël P CharlesInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Jean SchneikertInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Anne Catherine BretzInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Andrea NistInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Thorsten StieweInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center · DEGerman Center for Lung Research · DE

Funding

European Research Council 260431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inactivation of the p53 tumor suppressor by Mdm2 is one of the most frequent events in cancer, so compounds targeting the p53-Mdm2 interaction are promising for cancer therapy. Mechanisms conferring resistance to p53-reactivating compounds are largely unknown. Here we show using CRISPR-Cas9-based target validation in lung and colorectal cancer that the activity of nutlin, which blocks the p53-binding pocket of Mdm2, strictly depends on functional p53. In contrast, sensitivity to the drug RITA, which binds the Mdm2-interacting N terminus of p53, correlates with induction of DNA damage. Cells with primary or acquired RITA resistance display cross-resistance to DNA crosslinking compounds such as cisplatin and show increased DNA cross-link repair. Inhibition of FancD2 by RNA interference or pharmacological mTOR inhibitors restores RITA sensitivity. The therapeutic response to p53-reactivating compounds is therefore limited by compound-specific resistance mechanisms that can be resolved by CRISPR-Cas9-based target validation and should be considered when allocating patients to p53-reactivating treatments.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGenes, p53CisplatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinFuransGene Expression RegulationHCT116 CellsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMorpholinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2TOR Serine-Threonine KinasesUbiquitin-Protein Ligases(5-(2,4-bis((3S)-3-methylmorpholin-4-yl)pyrido(2,3-d)pyrimidin-7-yl)-2-methoxyphenyl)methanolCisplatinDNA-Binding ProteinsFANCD2 protein, humanFanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 ProteinFuransMDM2 protein, humanMorpholinesMTOR protein, humanNSC 652287Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2RAD18 protein, humanTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID26595461
PMCPMC4910870
OpenAlexW2178681339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.