Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26595426›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2015

Heroin delay discounting: Modulation by pharmacological state, drug-use impulsivity, and intelligence.

Jonathan J K Stoltman, Eric A Woodcock, Jamey J Lister, Leslie H Lundahl, Mark K Greenwald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Comparative Study of Delay Discounting Rates in Alcohol and Opioid Dependence in Northern India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan J K StoltmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University.
Eric A WoodcockDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University.
Jamey J ListerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University.
Leslie H LundahlDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University.
Mark K GreenwaldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine and Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University.

Funding

Biobehavioral Studies of Opioid Seeking: Effects of Buprenorphine/Naloxone Dose on Experimental Stress Reactivity and Opioid AbstinenceR01DA015462 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREENWALD, MARK K · 2003 to 2019
$5.5M
Selective radiolabeled agonists /antagonists for opiate receptor subtypesP50DA000254 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MOSBERG, HENRY ISAAC · 1985 to 2002
$5.0M
Reducing Cocaine/Heroin Abuse with SR-Amphetamine and BuprenorphineR01DA022243 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREENWALD, MARK K · 2006 to 2009
$980k
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA00254NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015462NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delay discounting (DD) refers to how rapidly an individual devalues goods based on delays to receipt. DD usually is considered a trait variable but can be state dependent, yet few studies have assessed commodity valuation at short, naturalistically relevant time intervals that might enable state-dependent analysis. This study aimed to determine whether drug-use impulsivity and intelligence influence heroin DD at short (ecologically relevant) delays during two pharmacological states (heroin satiation and withdrawal). Out-of-treatment, intensive heroin users (n = 170; 53.5% African American; 66.7% male) provided complete DD data during imagined heroin satiation and withdrawal. Delays were 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours; maximum delayed heroin amount was thirty $10 bags. Indifference points were used to calculate area under the curve (AUC). We also assessed drug-use impulsivity (subscales from the Impulsive Relapse Questionnaire [IRQ]) and estimated intelligence (Shipley IQ) as predictors of DD. Heroin discounting was greater (smaller AUC) during withdrawal than satiation. In regression analyses, lower intelligence and IRQ Capacity for Delay as well as higher IRQ Speed (to return to drug use) predicted greater heroin discounting in the satiation condition. Lower intelligence and higher IRQ Speed predicted greater discounting in the withdrawal condition. Sex, race, substance use variables, and other IRQ subscales were not significantly related to the withdrawal or satiation DD behavior. In summary, heroin discounting was temporally rapid, pharmacologically state dependent, and predicted by drug-use impulsivity and estimated intelligence. These findings highlight a novel and sensitive measure of acute DD that is easy to administer.

Indexed as

RewardAdultDelay DiscountingEmotional IntelligenceFemaleHeroinHeroin DependenceHumansImpulsive BehaviorIntelligenceMaleMiddle AgedSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeYoung AdultHeroin

Identifiers

PMID26595426
PMCPMC4661782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.