ArticleMedical care2016
Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey.
Article in Medical care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys.Medical care · 2022Pooled it
- Survey Protocols, Response Rates, and Representation of Underserved Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA health forum · 2024Trial
- Article
- Multilevel factors associated with nonresponse to patient-reported outcome measures in routine radiation oncology care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Scoping Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Case-mix Adjustment of Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs): a rapid review to inform benchmarking practices across inpatient health centers in Switzerland.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Review
- The patient and clinician perspective on 'early' bowel resection for terminal ileal Crohn's disease (EBRIC): protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
- Analysis of the Results of Monitoring the Quality of Services in Oncological Treatment, Conducted as Part of the Pilot Project of the National Cancer Network for Lung Cancer in 2019-2023, in Poland.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- The Use of Online Consultation Systems and Patient Experience of Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using the General Practice Patient Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Investigating Patient Use and Experience of Online Appointment Booking in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Treatment options for patients with pilonidal sinus disease: PITSTOP, a mixed-methods evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Observational
- Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Review
- Development and validation of a patient experience of care survey for emergency departments.Health services research · 2022Article
- Racial And Ethnic Disparities In Patient Experience Of Care Among Nonelderly Medicaid Managed Care Enrollees.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2022Article
- Article
- Sociodemographic inequalities in patients' experiences of primary care: an analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey in England between 2011 and 2017.Journal of health services research & policy · 2021Article
- What do patients and dermatologists prefer regarding low-risk basal cell carcinoma follow-up care? A discrete choice experiment.PloS one · 2021Article
- Using patient feedback to drive quality improvement in hospitals: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Patient Experiences in the United States: 4-Year Content Analysis of Twitter.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient surveys typically have variable response rates between organizations, leading to concerns that such differences may affect the validity of performance comparisons.
objectiveTo explore the size and likely sources of associations between hospital-level survey response rates and patient experience. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASURES: Cross-sectional mail survey including 60 patient experience items sent to 101,771 cancer survivors recently treated by 158 English NHS hospitals. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, clinical diagnosis, hospital type, and region were available for respondents and nonrespondents.
resultsThe overall response rate was 67% (range, 39% to 77% between hospitals). Hospitals with higher response rates had higher scores for all items (Spearman correlation range, 0.03-0.44), particularly questions regarding hospital-level administrative processes, for example, procedure cancellations or medical note availability.From multivariable analysis, associations between individual patient experience and hospital-level response rates were statistically significant (P<0.05) for 53/59 analyzed questions, decreasing to 37/59 after adjusting for case-mix, and 25/59 after further adjusting for hospital-level characteristics.Predicting responses of nonrespondents, and re-estimating hypothetical hospital scores assuming a 100% response rate, we found that currently low performing hospitals would have attained even lower scores. Overall nationwide attainment would have decreased slightly to that currently observed.
conclusionsHigher response rate hospitals have more positive experience scores, and this is only partly explained by patient case-mix. High response rates may be a marker of efficient hospital administration, and higher quality that should not, therefore, be adjusted away in public reporting. Although nonresponse may result in slightly overestimating overall national levels of performance, it does not appear to meaningfully bias comparisons of case-mix-adjusted hospital results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.