Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26595045›Full record

ReviewSeminars in respiratory and critical care medicine2015

To Trach or Not to Trach: Uncertainty in the Care of the Chronically Critically Ill.

Thomas Bice, Judith E Nelson, Shannon S Carson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Tracheostomy Outcomes in Children With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing the role of tracheostomy placement in bronchopulmonary dysplasia with pulmonary hypertension.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COVID-19 Tracheostomy Outcomes.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas BiceUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Judith E NelsonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Shannon S CarsonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCornell University · US

Funding

TRAINING IN RESPIRATORY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINET32HL007106 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOUCHER, RICHARD CHARLES, DOERSCHUK, CLAIRE M · 1985 to 2021
$7.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of chronically critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation and receiving a tracheostomy is steadily increasing. Early tracheostomy in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation has been proposed to decrease duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay, reduce mortality, and improve patient comfort. However, these benefits have been difficult to demonstrate in clinical trials. So how does one determine the appropriate timing for tracheostomy placement in your patient? Here we review the potential benefits and consequences of tracheostomy, the available evidence for tracheostomy timing, communication surrounding the tracheostomy decision, and a patient-centered approach to tracheostomy. Patients requiring > 10 days of mechanical ventilation who are expected to survive their hospitalization likely benefit from tracheostomy, but protocols involving routine early tracheostomy placement do not improve patient outcomes. However, patients with neurologic injury, provided they have a good prognosis for meaningful recovery, may benefit from early tracheostomy. In chronically critically ill patients with poor prognosis, tracheostomy is unlikely to provide benefit and should only be pursued if it is consistent with the patient's values, goals, and preferences. In this setting, communication with patients and surrogates regarding tracheostomy and prognosis becomes paramount. For the foreseeable future, decisions surrounding tracheostomy will remain relevant and challenging.

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialTracheostomyChronic DiseaseCritical CareCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID26595045
PMCPMC4809243
OpenAlexW2225851898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.