Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26594607›Full record

ArticleBioscience of microbiota, food and health2015

Short- and long-term dynamics in the intestinal microbiota following ingestion of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis GCL2505.

Yoshiyuki Tanaka, Kazuyo Takami, Tomohiko Nishijima, Ryo Aoki, Takashi Mawatari, Takayuki Ikeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience of microbiota, food and health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Association betweenBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Characterization of aApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Frontiers in nutrition · 2022
    Article
  12. Effects ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  13. Effects of synbiotics containingFood science & nutrition · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effect ofBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yoshiyuki TanakaInstitute of Health Science, Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd., 4-6-5 Utajima, Nishiyodogawa-ku, Osaka 555-8502, Japan ; R&D Division, Glico Dairy Products Co., Ltd., 2-14-1 Musashino, Akishima-shi, Tokyo 196-0021, Japan.
Kazuyo TakamiR&D Division, Glico Dairy Products Co., Ltd., 2-14-1 Musashino, Akishima-shi, Tokyo 196-0021, Japan.
Tomohiko NishijimaR&D Division, Glico Dairy Products Co., Ltd., 2-14-1 Musashino, Akishima-shi, Tokyo 196-0021, Japan.
Ryo AokiInstitute of Health Science, Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd., 4-6-5 Utajima, Nishiyodogawa-ku, Osaka 555-8502, Japan ; R&D Division, Glico Dairy Products Co., Ltd., 2-14-1 Musashino, Akishima-shi, Tokyo 196-0021, Japan.
Takashi MawatariInstitute of Health Science, Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd., 4-6-5 Utajima, Nishiyodogawa-ku, Osaka 555-8502, Japan ; R&D Division, Glico Dairy Products Co., Ltd., 2-14-1 Musashino, Akishima-shi, Tokyo 196-0021, Japan.
Takayuki IkedaFaculty of Human Life Science, Fuji Women's University, 4-5 Hanakawaminami, Ishikari-shi, Hokkaido 061-3204, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis GCL2505 (B. lactis GCL2505) is able to survive passage through the intestines and proliferate. The daily dynamics of the intestinal bifidobacteria following ingestion of probiotics are not yet clear. Moreover, the effects of long-term ingestion of probiotics on the intestinal microbiota have not been well studied. Two experiments were performed in the present study. In Experiment 1, 53 healthy female volunteers received B. lactis GCL2505; B. bifidum GCL2080, which can survive but not proliferate in the intestine; or yogurt fermented with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus for 2 weeks, and the daily dynamics of intestinal bifidobacteria were investigated. The number of fecal bifidobacteria significantly increased on day 1, and this was maintained until day 14 in the B. lactis GCL2505 ingestion group. However, no significant change in the number of fecal bifidobacteria was observed in the other groups throughout the ingestion period. In Experiment 2, 38 constipated volunteers received either B. lactis GCL2505 or a placebo for 8 weeks. Both the number of fecal bifidobacteria and the frequency of defecation significantly increased throughout the ingestion period in the B. lactis GCL2505 ingestion group. These results suggested that the proliferation of ingested bifidobacteria within the intestine contributed to a rapid increase in the amount of intestinal bifidobacteria and subsequent maintenance of these levels. Moreover, B. lactis GCL2505 improved the intestinal microbiota more effectively than non-proliferating bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumBifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis GCL2505dynamicsintestinal microbiotaprobioticsproliferation

Identifiers

PMID26594607
PMCPMC4639512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.