ArticleIUCrJ2015
Changes in protein structure at the interface accompanying complex formation.
Article in IUCrJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered protein regions enable biophysical interpretation of variant-effect predictors.HGG advances · 2026Article
- The multimerization pathway of the glucocorticoid receptor.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- The Impact of Thermal and pH Variations on the Structure of Cathepsin D in the Hepatopancreas of Japanese Clam (Current protein & peptide science · 2025Article
- LAFEM: A Scoring Model to Evaluate Functional Landscape of Lysine Acetylome.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024Article
- MetaScore: A Novel Machine-Learning-Based Approach to Improve Traditional Scoring Functions for Scoring Protein-Protein Docking Conformations.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Mixed mechanism of conformational selection and induced fit as a molecular recognition process in the calreticulin family of proteins.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- PP2A is activated by cytochromeComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Effect of gold nanoparticles on the structure and neuroprotective function of protein L-isoaspartyl methyltransferase (PIMT).Scientific reports · 2021Article
- MENSAdb: a thorough structural analysis of membrane protein dimers.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021Article
- Recombinant Enterovirus 71 Viral Protein 1 Fused to a Truncated Newcastle Disease Virus NP (NPt) Carrier Protein.Vaccines · 2020Article
- The R882H substitution in the humanThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- An account of solvent accessibility in protein-RNA recognition.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Structural changes in DNA-binding proteins on complexation.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Identifying and Visualizing Macromolecular Flexibility in Structural Biology.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2016Review
- Proteins: interaction at a distance.IUCrJ · 2015Article
- Structural characterization of a PCP-R didomain from an archaeal nonribosomal peptide synthetase reveals novel interdomain interactions.The Journal of biological chemistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein interactions are essential in all biological processes. The changes brought about in the structure when a free component forms a complex with another molecule need to be characterized for a proper understanding of molecular recognition as well as for the successful implementation of docking algorithms. Here, unbound (U) and bound (B) forms of protein structures from the Protein-Protein Interaction Affinity Database are compared in order to enumerate the changes that occur at the interface atoms/residues in terms of the solvent-accessible surface area (ASA), secondary structure, temperature factors (B factors) and disorder-to-order transitions. It is found that the interface atoms optimize contacts with the atoms in the partner protein, which leads to an increase in their ASA in the bound interface in the majority (69%) of the proteins when compared with the unbound interface, and this is independent of the root-mean-square deviation between the U and B forms. Changes in secondary structure during the transition indicate a likely extension of helices and strands at the expense of turns and coils. A reduction in flexibility during complex formation is reflected in the decrease in B factors of the interface residues on going from the U form to the B form. There is, however, no distinction in flexibility between the interface and the surface in the monomeric structure, thereby highlighting the potential problem of using B factors for the prediction of binding sites in the unbound form for docking another protein. 16% of the proteins have missing (disordered) residues in the U form which are observed (ordered) in the B form, mostly with an irregular conformation; the data set also shows differences in the composition of interface and non-interface residues in the disordered polypeptide segments as well as differences in their surface burial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.