ReviewJournal of intensive care2015
Fluid responsiveness in acute circulatory failure.
Review in Journal of intensive care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Comparison of Hemodynamic Status with Three Different Doses of Lidocaine as an Adjunct to Propofol-Remifentanil During Endotracheal Intubation in Elderly Female Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Hemodynamic effects of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine infusion for prophylaxis against spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in the elderly population undergoing hip fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2021Trial
- Hypertonic saline for goal-directed therapy guided by Capstesia in gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized controlled study.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2021Trial
- Agreement between carotid and LVOT non-invasive cardiac output measurements in ED septic shock patients: a prospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- The Accuracy of Dynamic Parameters for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Elderly Patients with Septic Shock.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Pathophysiology of Severe Burn Injuries: New Therapeutic Opportunities From a Systems Perspective.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2024Review
- Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with hemodynamic stability: a prospective repeated-measures study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Revolution in sepsis: a symptoms-based to a systems-based approach?Journal of biomedical science · 2024Review
- Central venous pressure and dynamic indices to assess fluid appropriateness in critically ill patients: A pilot study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Efficacy of using tidal volume challenge to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation reduced in low tidal volume ventilated critically ill patients with decreased respiratory system compliance.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Ketamine-based Versus Fentanyl-based Regimen for Rapid-sequence Endotracheal Intubation in Patients with Septic Shock: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care · 2021Article
- Comparison of Changes in PPV Using a Tidal Volume Challenge with a Passive Leg Raising Test to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Ventilated Using Low Tidal Volume.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021Article
- The ability of pulse oximetry-derived peripheral perfusion index to detect fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.Journal of anesthesia · 2021Article
- The ability of perfusion index to detect segmental ulnar nerve sparing after supraclavicular nerve block.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Observational
- Evaluation of fluid responsiveness during COVID-19 pandemic: what are the remaining choices?Journal of anesthesia · 2020Review
- Pulse Pressure Variation-Guided Fluid Therapy during Supratentorial Brain Tumour Excision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- The Impact of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Prolonged Major Abdominal Surgery on Extravascular Lung Water and Oxygenation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Validity of mini-fluid challenge for predicting fluid responsiveness following liver transplantation.BMC anesthesiology · 2019Observational
- Accuracy and trending of non-invasive hemoglobin measurement during different volume and perfusion statuses.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although fluid resuscitation of patients having acute circulatory failure is essential, avoiding unnecessary administration of fluids in these patients is also important. Fluid responsiveness (FR) is defined as the ability of the left ventricle to increase its stroke volume (SV) in response to fluid administration. The objective of this review is to provide the recent advances in the detection of FR and simplify the physiological basis, advantages, disadvantages, and cut-off values for each method. This review also highlights the present gaps in literature and provides future thoughts in the field of FR. Static methods are generally not recommended for the assessment of FR. Dynamic methods for the assessment of FR depend on heart-lung interactions. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) are the most famous dynamic measures. Less-invasive dynamic parameters include plethysmographic-derived parameters, variation in blood flow in large arteries, and variation in the diameters of central veins. Dynamic methods for the assessment of FR have many limitations; the most important limitation is spontaneous breathing activity. Fluid challenge techniques were able to overcome most of the limitations of the dynamic methods. Passive leg raising is the most popular fluid challenge method. More simple techniques have been recently introduced such as the mini-fluid challenge and 10-s fluid challenge. The main limitation of fluid challenge techniques is the need to trace the effect of the fluid challenges on SV (or any of its derivatives) using a real-time monitor. More research is needed in the field of FR taking into consideration not only the accuracy of the method but also the ease of implementation, the applicability on a wider range of patients, the time needed to apply each method, and the feasibility of its application by acute care physicians with moderate and low experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.