Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26594285›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2015

Effect of Doximity Residency Rankings on Residency Applicants' Program Choices.

Aimee M Rolston, Sarah E Hartley, Sorabh Khandelwal, Jenny G Christner, Debbie F Cheng, Rachel M Caty, Sally A Santen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Program Misrepresentation in the Doximity Residency Navigator.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Nationwide Bibliometric Analysis of Integrated Plastic Surgery Program Directors.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Accuracy in Residency Program Rankings on Social Media.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019
    Article
  17. Impact of Doximity Residency Navigator on Graduate Medical Education Recruitment.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aimee M RolstonUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sarah E HartleyUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sorabh KhandelwalOhio State University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Jenny G ChristnerUpstate Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, Syracuse, New York ; Baylor College of Medicine, Houstion, Texas.
Debbie F ChengUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Rachel M CatyUniversity of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sally A SantenUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChoosing a residency program is a stressful and important decision. Doximity released residency program rankings by specialty in September 2014. This study sought to investigate the impact of those rankings on residency application choices made by fourth year medical students.

methodsA 12-item survey was administered in October 2014 to fourth year medical students at three schools. Students indicated their specialty, awareness of and perceived accuracy of the rankings, and the rankings' impact on the programs to which they chose to apply. Descriptive statistics were reported for all students and those applying to Emergency Medicine (EM).

resultsA total of 461 (75.8%) students responded, with 425 applying in one of the 20 Doximity ranked specialties. Of the 425, 247 (58%) were aware of the rankings and 177 looked at them. On a 1-100 scale (100=very accurate), students reported a mean ranking accuracy rating of 56.7 (SD 20.3). Forty-five percent of students who looked at the rankings modified the number of programs to which they applied. The majority added programs. Of the 47 students applying to EM, 18 looked at the rankings and 33% changed their application list with most adding programs.

conclusionThe Doximity rankings had real effects on students applying to residencies as almost half of students who looked at the rankings modified their program list. Additionally, students found the rankings to be moderately accurate. Graduating students might benefit from emphasis on more objective characterization of programs to assess in light of their own interests and personal/career goals.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceAdultEmergency MedicineFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26594285
PMCPMC4651589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.