Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26594243›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2015

gammaMAXT: a fast multiple-testing correction algorithm.

François Van Lishout, Francesco Gadaleta, Jason H Moore, Louis Wehenkel, Kristel Van Steen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

François Van LishoutSystems and Modeling Unit, Montefiore Institute, University of Liège, Allée de la découverte 10, Liège, 4000 Belgium ; Bioinformatics and Modeling, GIGA-R, Avenue de l'Hôpital 1, Sart-Tilman, 4000 Belgium.
Francesco GadaletaSystems and Modeling Unit, Montefiore Institute, University of Liège, Allée de la découverte 10, Liège, 4000 Belgium ; Bioinformatics and Modeling, GIGA-R, Avenue de l'Hôpital 1, Sart-Tilman, 4000 Belgium.
Jason H MooreInstitute for Biomedical Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 19104-6021 PA USA.
Louis WehenkelSystems and Modeling Unit, Montefiore Institute, University of Liège, Allée de la découverte 10, Liège, 4000 Belgium ; Bioinformatics and Modeling, GIGA-R, Avenue de l'Hôpital 1, Sart-Tilman, 4000 Belgium.
Kristel Van SteenSystems and Modeling Unit, Montefiore Institute, University of Liège, Allée de la découverte 10, Liège, 4000 Belgium ; Bioinformatics and Modeling, GIGA-R, Avenue de l'Hôpital 1, Sart-Tilman, 4000 Belgium.

Funding

Machine Learning Prediction of Cancer SusceptibilityR01LM009012 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2006 to 2014
$3.3M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of the MaxT algorithm is to provide a significance test algorithm that controls the family-wise error rate (FWER) during simultaneous hypothesis testing. However, the requirements in terms of computing time and memory of this procedure are proportional to the number of investigated hypotheses. The memory issue has been solved in 2013 by Van Lishout's implementation of MaxT, which makes the memory usage independent from the size of the dataset. This algorithm is implemented in MBMDR-3.0.3, a software that is able to identify genetic interactions, for a variety of SNP-SNP based epistasis models effectively. On the other hand, that implementation turned out to be less suitable for genome-wide interaction analysis studies, due to the prohibitive computational burden.

resultsIn this work we introduce gammaMAXT, a novel implementation of the maxT algorithm for multiple testing correction. The algorithm was implemented in software MBMDR-4.2.2, as part of the MB-MDR framework to screen for SNP-SNP, SNP-environment or SNP-SNP-environment interactions at a genome-wide level. We show that, in the absence of interaction effects, test-statistics produced by the MB-MDR methodology follow a mixture distribution with a point mass at zero and a shifted gamma distribution for the top 10 % of the strictly positive values. We show that the gammaMAXT algorithm has a power comparable to MaxT and maintains FWER, but requires less computational resources and time. We analyze a dataset composed of 10(6) SNPs and 1000 individuals within one day on a 256-core computer cluster. The same analysis would take about 10(4) times longer with MBMDR-3.0.3.

conclusionsThese results are promising for future GWAIs. However, the proposed gammaMAXT algorithm offers a general significance assessment and multiple testing approach, applicable to any context that requires performing hundreds of thousands of tests. It offers new perspectives for fast and efficient permutation-based significance assessment in large-scale (integrated) omics studies.

Indexed as

3-order interactionsAlgorithmicGamma distributionGenome-wide interaction studiesMaxTMultiple testingSNP-environment interactions

Identifiers

PMID26594243
PMCPMC4654922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.