Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26593873›Full record

ReviewPediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2016

Improving the safety of oral immunotherapy for food allergy.

Marta Vazquez-Ortiz, Paul J Turner

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Fatal food anaphylaxis in adults and children.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Manufacturing processes of peanut (Frontiers in allergy · 2022
    Article
  13. Mechanisms of oral immunotherapy.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. New Perspectives in Food Allergy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Regional Differences in Food Allergies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2019
    Review
  18. GRADE-ing the Benefit/Risk Equation in Food Immunotherapy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Oral immunotherapy with peach juice in patients allergic to LTPs.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta Vazquez-OrtizSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul J TurnerSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9862-5161
Imperial College London · GBThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K010468/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food allergy is a major public health problem in children, impacting upon the affected individual, their families and others charged with their care, for example educational establishments, and the food industry. In contrast to most other paediatric diseases, there is no established cure: current management is based upon dietary avoidance and the provision of rescue medication in the event of accidental reactions, which are common. This strategy has significant limitations and impacts adversely on health-related quality of life. In the last decade, research into disease-modifying treatments for food allergy has emerged, predominantly for peanut, egg and cow's milk. Most studies have used the oral route (oral immunotherapy, OIT), in which increasing amounts of allergen are given over weeks-months. OIT has proven effective to induce immune modulation and 'desensitization' - that is, an increase in the amount of food allergen that can be consumed, so long as regular (typically daily) doses are continued. However, its ability to induce permanent tolerance once ongoing exposure has stopped seems limited. Additionally, the short- and long-term safety of OIT is often poorly reported, raising concerns about its implementation in routine practice. Most patients experience allergic reactions and, although generally mild, severe reactions have occurred. Long-term adherence is unclear, which rises concerns given the low rates of long-term tolerance induction. Current research focuses on improving current limitations, especially safety. Strategies include alternative routes (sublingual, epicutaneous), modified hypoallergenic products and adjuvants (anti-IgE, pre-/probiotics). Biomarkers of safe/successful OIT are also under investigation.

Indexed as

Desensitization, ImmunologicAdministration, OralAllergensAnaphylaxisAnimalsChildFood HypersensitivityHumansQuality ImprovementAllergenschildrenfood allergyoral immunotherapyquality of lifesafety

Identifiers

PMID26593873
PMCPMC4950028
OpenAlexW2181269549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.