Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26593781›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2016

Rationale, design, samples, and baseline sun protection in a randomized trial on a skin cancer prevention intervention in resort environments.

David B Buller, Peter A Andersen, Barbara J Walkosz, Michael D Scott, Larry Beck, Gary R Cutter

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David B BullerKlein Buendel, Inc., 1667 Cole Boulevard, Suite 225, Golden, CO 80401, United States. Electronic address: dbuller@kleinbuendel.com.
Peter A AndersenSchool of Communication, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182, United States. Electronic address: westone47@gmail.com.
Barbara J WalkoszKlein Buendel, Inc., 1667 Cole Boulevard, Suite 225, Golden, CO 80401, United States. Electronic address: bwalkosz@kleinbuendel.com.
Michael D ScottCalifornia State University and President of Mikonics, Inc., 40 B Old Road South, Santa Fe, NM 87540, United States. Electronic address: michael.granker@gmail.com.
Larry BeckL. Robert Payne School of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Room PSFA 445, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, United States. Electronic address: lbeck@mail.sdsu.edu.
Gary R CutterDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, RPHB 401B, University of Alabama, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States. Electronic address: cutterg@uab.edu.
Klein Buendel (United States) · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of Alabama · US

Funding

Comprehensive Sun Protection in Recreation: An Advanced Go Sun Smart ProgramR01CA152411 · NCI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSEN, PETER ALEX · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA152411NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExposure to solar ultraviolet radiation during recreation is a risk factor for skin cancer. A trial evaluated an intervention to promote advanced sun protection (sunscreen pre-application/reapplication; protective hats and clothing; use of shade) during vacations. MATERIALS AND

methodsAdult visitors to hotels/resorts with outdoor recreation (i.e., vacationers) participated in a group-randomized pretest-posttest controlled quasi-experimental design in 2012-14. Hotels/resorts were pair-matched and randomly assigned to the intervention or untreated control group. Sun. protection (e.g., clothing, hats, shade and sunscreen) was measured in cross-sectional samples by observation and a face-to-face intercept survey during two-day visits.

resultsInitially, 41 hotel/resorts (11%) participated but 4 dropped out before posttest. Hotel/resorts were diverse (employees=30 to 900; latitude=24° 78' N to 50° 52' N; elevation=2ft. to 9726ft. above sea level), and had a variety of outdoor venues (beaches/pools, court/lawn games, golf courses, common areas, and chairlifts). At pretest, 4347 vacationers were observed and 3531 surveyed. More females were surveyed (61%) than observed (50%). Vacationers were mostly 35-60years old, highly educated (college education=68%) and non-Hispanic white (93%), with high-risk skin types (22%). Vacationers reported covering 60% of their skin with clothing. Also, 40% of vacationers used shade; 60% applied sunscreen; and 42% had been sunburned.

conclusionsThe trial faced challenges recruiting resorts but result showed that the large, multi-state sample of vacationers were at high risk for solar UV exposure.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHolidaysProtective ClothingRecreationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHealth ResortsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkin NeoplasmsSunscreening AgentsUnited StatesYoung AdultSunscreening AgentsClothingInterventionPreventionRecreationSkin cancerSunscreen

Identifiers

PMID26593781
PMCPMC4714565
OpenAlexW2175494620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.