ArticleNature reviews. Genetics2016
Principle of proportionality in genomic data sharing.
Article in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing core outcomes of responsible stewardship for human genomic data in the cloud.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Dicing with data: the risks, benefits, tensions and tech of health data in the iToBoS project.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Genomic Diagnosis of Rare Pediatric Disease in the United Kingdom and Ireland.The New England journal of medicine · 2023Article
- Ethical Considerations in Research with Genomic Data.The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body · 2023Article
- Exome/Genome-Wide Testing in Newborn Screening: A Proportionate Path Forward.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Rethinking the ethical principles of genomic medicine services.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020Article
- Genomic variant sharing: a position statement.Wellcome open research · 2019Article
- Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018Review
- Future Roadmaps for Precision Medicine Applied to Diabetes: Rising to the Challenge of Heterogeneity.Journal of diabetes research · 2018Review
- Genomic medicine and data sharing.British medical bulletin · 2017Review
- Returning genome sequences to research participants: Policy and practice.Wellcome open research · 2017Article
- Big data or bust: realizing the microbial genomics revolution.Microbial genomics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose that a principle of proportionality be applied to genomic data that weighs the depth of data (what is shared) against the breadth of sharing (with whom).
Indexed as
Identifiers
26593419What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.