Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26593272›Full record

ReviewNature communications2015

Extinction risk of soil biota.

Stavros D Veresoglou, John M Halley, Matthias C Rillig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Soil biota contributions to soil aggregation.Nature ecology & evolution · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unique tree: Foliar endophytic fungi of the critically endangered Andreadoxa flava (Rutaceae) in Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The role of soils in provision of genetic, medicinal and biochemical resources.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stavros D VeresoglouFreie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie, Plant Ecology, Altensteinstrasse 6, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6387-4109
John M HalleyDepartment of Biological Applications and Technology, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Matthias C RilligFreie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie, Plant Ecology, Altensteinstrasse 6, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No species lives on earth forever. Knowing when and why species go extinct is crucial for a complete understanding of the consequences of anthropogenic activity, and its impact on ecosystem functioning. Even though soil biota play a key role in maintaining the functioning of ecosystems, the vast majority of existing studies focus on aboveground organisms. Many questions about the fate of belowground organisms remain open, so the combined effort of theorists and applied ecologists is needed in the ongoing development of soil extinction ecology.

Indexed as

BiotaSoilAnimalsBiodiversityEukaryotaSoil

Identifiers

PMID26593272
PMCPMC4673489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.