Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26593010›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2012

Enhanced Sampling in Free Energy Calculations: Combining SGLD with the Bennett's Acceptance Ratio and Enveloping Distribution Sampling Methods.

Gerhard König, Benjamin T Miller, Stefan Boresch, Xiongwu Wu, Bernard R Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Computational scheme for pH-dependent binding free energy calculation with explicit solvent.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerhard KönigLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States.
Benjamin T MillerLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States.
Stefan BoreschDepartment of Computational Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Währingerstraße 17, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Xiongwu WuLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States.
Bernard R BrooksLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Development Of Theoretical Methods For Studying Biological MacromoleculesZIAHL001051 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI BROOKS, BERNARD R · 2009 to 2025
$16.2M
Molecular Dynamics Simulations Of Biological MacromoleculesZIAHL001050 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI BROOKS, BERNARD R · 2009 to 2025
$12.9M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HL999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HL001050Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HL001051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the key requirements for the accurate calculation of free energy differences is proper sampling of conformational space. Especially in biological applications, molecular dynamics simulations are often confronted with rugged energy surfaces and high energy barriers, leading to insufficient sampling and, in turn, poor convergence of the free energy results. In this work, we address this problem by employing enhanced sampling methods. We explore the possibility of using self-guided Langevin dynamics (SGLD) to speed up the exploration process in free energy simulations. To obtain improved free energy differences from such simulations, it is necessary to account for the effects of the bias due to the guiding forces. We demonstrate how this can be accomplished for the Bennett's acceptance ratio (BAR) and the enveloping distribution sampling (EDS) methods. While BAR is considered among the most efficient methods available for free energy calculations, the EDS method developed by Christ and van Gunsteren is a promising development that reduces the computational costs of free energy calculations by simulating a single reference state. To evaluate the accuracy of both approaches in connection with enhanced sampling, EDS was implemented in CHARMM. For testing, we employ benchmark systems with analytical reference results and the mutation of alanine to serine. We find that SGLD with reweighting can provide accurate results for BAR and EDS where conventional molecular dynamics simulations fail. In addition, we compare the performance of EDS with other free energy methods. We briefly discuss the implications of our results and provide practical guidelines for conducting free energy simulations with SGLD.

Identifiers

PMID26593010
PMCPMC6413517
OpenAlexW2334980207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.