Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26591004›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2016

Friends or foes? Emerging insights from fungal interactions with plants.

Susanne Zeilinger, Vijai K Gupta, Tanya E S Dahms, Roberto N Silva, Harikesh B Singh, Ram S Upadhyay, Eriston Vieira Gomes, Clement Kin-Ming Tsui, Chandra Nayak S

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
26.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 366 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The bacteria of a fig community.Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Plant Biotic Stress: Tools and Techniques for Crop Protection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chromosome-Level Genome Announcement of the MonokaryoticJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Susanne ZeilingerInstitute of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Vijai K GuptaMolecular Glycobiotechnology Group, Discipline of Biochemistry, School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland vijaifzd@gmail.com.
Tanya E S DahmsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Regina, SK, Canada.
Roberto N SilvaDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), 14049-900 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Harikesh B SinghDepartment of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India.
Ram S UpadhyayDepartment of Botany, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India.
Eriston Vieira GomesDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), 14049-900 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Clement Kin-Ming TsuiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4.
Chandra Nayak SDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Mysore, Mysore-570001, Karnataka, India.
Banaras Hindu University · INUniversidade de São Paulo · BROllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Mysore · INUniversity of Regina · CA

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF V 139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungi interact with plants in various ways, with each interaction giving rise to different alterations in both partners. While fungal pathogens have detrimental effects on plant physiology, mutualistic fungi augment host defence responses to pathogens and/or improve plant nutrient uptake. Tropic growth towards plant roots or stomata, mediated by chemical and topographical signals, has been described for several fungi, with evidence of species-specific signals and sensing mechanisms. Fungal partners secrete bioactive molecules such as small peptide effectors, enzymes and secondary metabolites which facilitate colonization and contribute to both symbiotic and pathogenic relationships. There has been tremendous advancement in fungal molecular biology, omics sciences and microscopy in recent years, opening up new possibilities for the identification of key molecular mechanisms in plant-fungal interactions, the power of which is often borne out in their combination. Our fragmentary knowledge on the interactions between plants and fungi must be made whole to understand the potential of fungi in preventing plant diseases, improving plant productivity and understanding ecosystem stability. Here, we review innovative methods and the associated new insights into plant-fungal interactions.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsFungiPlant DiseasesPlantsadvanced microscopycrop productivityphytopathogenic and symbiotic fungiplant defence responseplant–fungal interactionsplant receptors

Identifiers

PMID26591004
PMCPMC4778271
OpenAlexW2284022146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.