ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced cancer evaluated by a palliative care team at an emergency center. A retrospective study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06615349 (DigiPall; a Randomized Controlled Trial of Digital Patient Reported Outcome and Biomarker Monitoring in Palliative Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DigiPall; a Randomized Controlled Trial of Digital Patient Reported Outcome and Biomarker Monitoring in Palliative Care
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) Tool in Germany.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of Palliative Care before Death in Reducing Emergency Care Utilization for Patients with Terminal Cancer and Trends in the Utilization of Palliative Care from 2005-2018.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Free-text analysis of general practice out-of-hours (GPOOH) use by people with advanced cancer: an analysis of coded and uncoded free-text data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Article
- Community prescribing trends and prevalence in the last year of life, for people who die from cancer.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- End-of-life care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer: an exploratory study of service utilisation and unmet supportive care needs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Establishment of a Palliative Care Consultation Service (PCCS) in an Acute Hospital Setting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Factors affecting use of unscheduled care for people with advanced cancer: a retrospective cohort study in Scotland.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
- Nausea in advanced cancer: relationships between intensity, burden, and the need for help.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019Article
- mHealth Technologies for Palliative Care Patients at the Interface of In-Patient to Outpatient Care: Protocol of Feasibility Study Aiming to Early Predict Deterioration of Patient's Health Status.JMIR research protocols · 2017Article
- Characteristics of patients with an unplanned admission to an acute palliative care unit.Internal and emergency medicine · 2017Article
- Retrospective study of unplanned hospital admission for metastatic cancer patients visiting the emergency department.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017Article
- Impact of early palliative interventions on the outcomes of care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Article
- Outcomes of Specialist Palliative Care Consultation for Patients with Advanced Cancer in an Oncological Emergency Department: A Retrospective Analysis.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
- Characteristics of Advanced Cancer Patients Admitted to the Palliative Care Unit from the Emergency Department.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatients with advanced cancer may be referred for a palliative care consultation (PC) from a hospital emergency center (EC) or as inpatients. However, research about symptoms and outcomes in patients with advanced cancer who receive PC at the EC is limited.
methodsWe reviewed demographic variables, frequency and intensity of symptoms (using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS)), PC interventions, time from admission to PC consultation, hospitalization duration, and discharge destination of 200 advanced cancer patients referred to PC services from the EC ("EC patients") and 200 matched advanced cancer inpatients referred to PC services ("inpatients") from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2011.
resultsThe median age for all patients was 56 years (range, 48-64 years); 222 (56 %) patients were female, and 243 (61 %) were white. There were no significant demographic differences between the EC patients and inpatients. The median time from admission to PC was 12 h (range, 7-23 h) for the EC patients and 24 h (24-96 h) for the inpatients (p < 0.0001). For EC patients and inpatients, symptoms at presentation for PC consultation included uncontrolled pain (83 and 45 %, respectively; p < 0.0001), nausea/vomiting/constipation (41 and 19 %, respectively; p < 0.0001), and dyspnea (29 and 19 %, respectively; p = 0.02). The medians and interquartile ranges of baseline symptom intensities for EC patients and inpatients, respectively, were as follows: pain, 7 (5-9) and 5 (2-8) (p < 0.0001); fatigue, 7 (4-8) and 6 (4-8) (p = 0.0517); and sleep, 6 (0-8) and 4 (1-7) (p = 0.1064). At follow-up, improvement was observed in pain (125/238 [53 %]), sleep (59/131 [45 %]), well-being (32/82 [39 %]), fatigue (53/139 [38 %]), anxiety (51/132 [39 %]), appetite (46/132 [35 %]), dyspnea (49/160 [31 %]), nausea (52/170 [31 %]), depression (36/123 [29 %]), and drowsiness (37/126 [29 %]). After PC consultations, discharge/admission destinations for EC patients were as follows: home, 65 (33 %); home hospice, 13 (7 %); inpatient hospice, 8 (4 %); regular hospital floor, 65 (33 %); and PC unit, 46 (23 %). The median duration of hospitalization was 92 h (range, 69-114) for hospitalized EC patients and 125 h (range, 108-142) for inpatients (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsReferral to PC from the EC led to earlier delivery of PC with subsequent earlier control of symptoms. EC patients who received PC consultations and were hospitalized had shorter hospitalizations than PC referral in the inpatient area. More research is needed to describe the impact of PC services on symptom assessment and management and on goals and plan of care in patients with advanced illness admitted to the EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26590844What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.