Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26590807›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2016

Telephone follow-up after day case tension-free vaginal tape insertion.

Helen Jefferis, Francis Muriithi, Beverly White, Natalia Price, Simon Jackson

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Telehealth for gynaecology outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Patient and clinician experiences.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2022
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Telephone interview in urogynecology in the era of COVID-19 pandemicJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helen JefferisDepartment of Gynaecology, The Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. helenjefferis@doctors.org.uk.
Francis MuriithiDepartment of Gynaecology, The Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Beverly WhiteDepartment of Gynaecology, The Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Natalia PriceDepartment of Gynaecology, The Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Simon JacksonDepartment of Gynaecology, The Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPost-operative review allows assessment of individual patient outcome, evaluation of any ongoing symptoms and an audit of departmental surgical outcome and therefore represents best clinical practice. Current TVT surgery follow-up practice varies widely, with most centres routinely seeing patients face to face in an outpatient setting. However, unnecessary outpatient attendance can be inefficient and inconvenient for patients and staff. One proposed alternative is telemedical follow-up, as introduced by our unit in 2010. We report on 5 years of experience with telephone follow-up.

methodsThe British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) database was searched for all cases of primary retropubic TVT slings performed by the unit in the period 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014. Cases identified from the BSUG database then had their case notes reviewed. Patients having additional surgery were excluded from analysis. This yielded a cohort of 356 patients. No ethical approval was required for this investigation as it was a simple observational study (clinical audit).

resultsTwo hundred and sixty-two patients were initially followed up via telephone; the remaining 94 were seen in a conventional outpatient clinic setting. Of the 262 followed up by telephone, 28 patients (10 %) subsequently required review in an outpatient clinic for a variety of reasons.

conclusionsTelephone follow-up is an appropriate mode of follow-up for uncomplicated primary incontinence surgery. By using telemedicine, 234 patients who would previously have been seen in clinic were followed up remotely, saving valuable clinic time for patients with greater clinical need.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsTelemedicineTelephoneAdultAftercareAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareFemaleHumansMedical AuditMiddle AgedOffice VisitsUrinary Incontinence, StressYoung AdultMid-urethral slingPost-operative reviewTelephone follow-up

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.