ArticleNeuron2015
Bridging the Gap: Muscarinic M4 Receptors Promote Striatal Plasticity in Health and Disease.
Article in Neuron, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The neurobiological basis for novel experimental therapeutics in dystonia.Neurobiology of disease · 2019Review
- Roles of centromedian parafascicular nuclei of thalamus and cholinergic interneurons in the dorsal striatum in associative learning of environmental events.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this issue of Neuron, Shen et al. (2015) demonstrate that the M4 muscarinic receptor regulates striatal plasticity. The authors use an M4-positive allosteric modulator, which facilitates long-term depression in direct pathway neurons and reverses aberrant plasticity in levodopa-induced dyskinesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26590337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.