Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26590280›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2016

Validation of a Previously Developed Geospatial Model That Predicts the Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in New York State Produce Fields.

Daniel Weller, Suvash Shiwakoti, Peter Bergholz, Yrjo Grohn, Martin Wiedmann, Laura K Strawn

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Quantitative Risk Assessment Model forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel WellerDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Suvash ShiwakotiDepartment of Veterinary and Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
Peter BergholzDepartment of Veterinary and Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
Yrjo GrohnDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Martin WiedmannDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Laura K StrawnDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic University, Painter, Virginia, USA lstrawn@vt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advancements, particularly in the field of geographic information systems (GIS), have made it possible to predict the likelihood of foodborne pathogen contamination in produce production environments using geospatial models. Yet, few studies have examined the validity and robustness of such models. This study was performed to test and refine the rules associated with a previously developed geospatial model that predicts the prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in produce farms in New York State (NYS). Produce fields for each of four enrolled produce farms were categorized into areas of high or low predicted L. monocytogenes prevalence using rules based on a field's available water storage (AWS) and its proximity to water, impervious cover, and pastures. Drag swabs (n = 1,056) were collected from plots assigned to each risk category. Logistic regression, which tested the ability of each rule to accurately predict the prevalence of L. monocytogenes, validated the rules based on water and pasture. Samples collected near water (odds ratio [OR], 3.0) and pasture (OR, 2.9) showed a significantly increased likelihood of L. monocytogenes isolation compared to that for samples collected far from water and pasture. Generalized linear mixed models identified additional land cover factors associated with an increased likelihood of L. monocytogenes isolation, such as proximity to wetlands. These findings validated a subset of previously developed rules that predict L. monocytogenes prevalence in produce production environments. This suggests that GIS and geospatial models can be used to accurately predict L. monocytogenes prevalence on farms and can be used prospectively to minimize the risk of preharvest contamination of produce.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyGeographic Information SystemsAgricultureComputer SimulationCrops, AgriculturalFood ContaminationListeria monocytogenesNew YorkPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID26590280
PMCPMC4725284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.