Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26590240›Full record

Trial reportHealth education research2015

Making healthy eating and physical activity policy practice: process evaluation of a group randomized controlled intervention in afterschool programs.

R Glenn Weaver, Michael W Beets, Brent Hutto, Ruth P Saunders, Justin B Moore, Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy, Jennifer L Huberty, Dianne S Ward, Russell R Pate, Aaron Beighle and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Identifying Strategies Programs Adopt to Meet Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Standards in Afterschool Programs.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Compliance With the Healthy Eating Standards in YMCA After-School Programs.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

R Glenn WeaverDepartment of Exercise Science, weaverrg@mailbox.sc.edu.
Michael W BeetsDepartment of Exercise Science.
Brent HuttoDepartment of Exercise Science.
Ruth P SaundersDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior.
Justin B MooreDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Office of Practice and Community Engagement, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Gabrielle Turner-McGrievyDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior.
Jennifer L HubertySchool of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Dianne S WardDepartment of Nutrition, Schools of Public Health and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Russell R PateDepartment of Exercise Science.
Aaron BeighleDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA and.
Darcy FreedmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

Physical Activity and Nutrition Intervention in Afterschool ProgramsR01HL112787 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BEETS, MICHAEL W · 2012 to 2015
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL11278702NHLBI NIH HHS L40 HL120010NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL112787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes the link between level of implementation and outcomes from an intervention to increase afterschool programs' (ASPs) achievement of healthy eating and physical activity (HE-PA) Standards. Ten intervention ASPs implemented the Strategies-To-Enhance-Practice (STEPs), a multi-component, adaptive intervention framework identifying factors essential to meeting HE-PA Standards, while 10 control ASPs continued routine practice. All programs, intervention and control, were assigned a STEPs for HE-PA index score based on implementation. Mixed-effects linear regressions showed high implementation ASPs had the greatest percentage of boys and girls achieving 30 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (47.3 and 29.3%), followed by low implementation ASPs (41.3 and 25.0%), and control ASPs (34.8 and 18.5%). For healthy eating, high/low implementation programs served fruits and vegetables an equivalent number of days, but more days than control programs (74.0 and 79.1% of days versus 14.2%). A similar pattern emerged for the percent of days sugar-sweetened foods and beverages were served, with high and low implementation programs serving sugar-sweetened foods (8.0 and 8.4% of days versus 52.2%), and beverages (8.7 and 2.9% of days versus 34.7%) equivalently, but less often than control programs. Differences in characteristics and implementation of STEPs for HE-PA between high/low implementers were also identified.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyExerciseHealth PolicyChildDietary SucroseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleRacial GroupsSchoolsSouth CarolinaDietary Sucrose

Identifiers

PMID26590240
PMCPMC4836399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.