SynthesisBMJ quality & safety2016
What methods are used to apply positive deviance within healthcare organisations? A systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ quality & safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Enablers of successful dissemination of uncommon practices in positive deviance studies for nutrition: A scoping review.BMC nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Strategies and tools to learn from work that goes well within healthcare patient safety practices: a mixed methods systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Does team reflexivity impact teamwork and communication in interprofessional hospital-based healthcare teams? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMJ quality & safety · 2020Pooled it
- Characteristics of healthcare organisations struggling to improve quality: results from a systematic review of qualitative studies.BMJ quality & safety · 2019Pooled it
- What methods are used to apply positive deviance within healthcare organisations? A systematic review.BMJ quality & safety · 2016Pooled it
- Implementation of a complex intervention to reduce hospitalizations from nursing homes: a mixed-method evaluation of implementation processes and outcomes.BMC geriatrics · 2022Trial
- Unifying bright spots research for people and nature.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Review
- "Building the boat while sailing" - adapting towards telementoring literacy.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Leveraging the Positive Deviance Approach to Drive Behavior Change in Noncommunicable Diseases: A Scoping Review.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Representation of Women, Older Adults, and Racial and Ethnic Minoritized Patients in Pivotal Trials for US Food and Drug Administration Novel Oncology Therapeutic Approvals, 2012-2021: Bright Spot Trials and Trends Over Time.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- Nurses' Experiences of Rebel Nurse Leadership in Psychiatric Care: A Qualitative Interview Study of Positive Deviance.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Access to eye health services among older people with disabilities in Karamoja, Uganda: a qualitative exploration of successful care seeking.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Uncovering success stories: how to resuscitate in situ simulation initiatives in Canadian emergency departments.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Global trends of positive deviance research in public health: A bibliometric analysis (1976-2024).Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Physicians' and Residents' Well-Being in Ecological System: A Scoping Review of Positive Deviance Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Geographic Clusters in Sepsis Hospital Mortality and the Role of Targeted Regionalization.Critical care medicine · 2025Article
- What made people (more) positive toward the COVID-19 vaccine? Exploring positive and negative deviance perspectives.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Measuring the positive potential value of birth in economic evaluation of perinatal interventions.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Organizational factors behind low sickness absence in Swedish municipalities-An explorative qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Enablers to high vaccination uptake among a disadvantaged minority population: a qualitative study of the Arab population of Israel.Israel journal of health policy research · 2024Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe positive deviance approach focuses on those who demonstrate exceptional performance, despite facing the same constraints as others. 'Positive deviants' are identified and hypotheses about how they succeed are generated. These hypotheses are tested and then disseminated within the wider community. The positive deviance approach is being increasingly applied within healthcare organisations, although limited guidance exists and different methods, of varying quality, are used. This paper systematically reviews healthcare applications of the positive deviance approach to explore how positive deviance is defined, the quality of existing applications and the methods used within them, including the extent to which staff and patients are involved.
methodsPeer-reviewed articles, published prior to September 2014, reporting empirical research on the use of the positive deviance approach within healthcare, were identified from seven electronic databases. A previously defined four-stage process for positive deviance in healthcare was used as the basis for data extraction. Quality assessments were conducted using a validated tool, and a narrative synthesis approach was followed.
results37 of 818 articles met the inclusion criteria. The positive deviance approach was most frequently applied within North America, in secondary care, and to address healthcare-associated infections. Research predominantly identified positive deviants and generated hypotheses about how they succeeded. The approach and processes followed were poorly defined. Research quality was low, articles lacked detail and comparison groups were rarely included. Applications of positive deviance typically lacked staff and/or patient involvement, and the methods used often required extensive resources.
conclusionFurther research is required to develop high quality yet practical methods which involve staff and patients in all stages of the positive deviance approach. The efficacy and efficiency of positive deviance must be assessed and compared with other quality improvement approaches. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014009365.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.