Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26590134›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2016

Kinship analysis: assessment of related vs unrelated based on defined pedigrees.

Stefania Turrina, Melissa Ferrian, Stefano Caratti, Emanuela Cosentino, Domenico De Leo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Combined effects of multiple linked loci on pairwise sibling tests.International journal of legal medicine · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefania TurrinaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Institute of Legal Medicine, Forensic Genetic Laboratory, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, P.le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy. stefania.turrina@univr.it.
Melissa FerrianDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Institute of Legal Medicine, Forensic Genetic Laboratory, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, P.le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Stefano CarattiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Institute of Legal Medicine, Forensic Genetic Laboratory, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, P.le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Emanuela CosentinoDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Institute of Legal Medicine, Forensic Genetic Laboratory, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, P.le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Domenico De LeoDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Institute of Legal Medicine, Forensic Genetic Laboratory, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, P.le L.A. Scuro, 37134, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed at evaluating whether the adoption of enlarged batteries of STR markers in kinship analysis may provide LR values suitable for discrimination of relatives from non-relatives, in comparison to conventionally used STR panels. The presence of LD among some loci and its effects on LR values were also assessed. Three hundred pairs of related and unrelated individuals, each separated from 1-3 generations and residing in North Italy were genotyped with the Investigator HDplex STR kit (Qiagen), AmpFlSTR Identifiler (Applied Biosystems), and PowerPlex Fusion System (Promega). Loci and alleles shared between each pair and within groups of relatives were compared. Also, combined LR values with and without loci in LD, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each commercial kit and their combinations. Full siblings displayed the largest number of shared loci and alleles, with a proportion of LR ≥ 10 results significantly higher than other degrees of relatedness and, consequently, with the lowest percentage of inconclusive and false negative results. Only minor differences were detected in the combined LR distributions, after including or omitting loci in LD. However, these became only appreciable when analyzing more distant relative pairs.The implementation of additional STRs into the LR calculation allowed a complete and robust discrimination between relatives and non-relatives only for full siblings, by removing the typical uncertainty of the "grey zone", while this was not achieved among other degrees of relatedness. Furthermore, the presence of loci in LD seems to not significantly affect LR distributions within each generation.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingMicrosatellite RepeatsAllelesFemaleGenotypeHumansItalyLikelihood FunctionsMaleMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPedigreeGrey zoneKinship analysisLikelihood ratioShort tandem repeats

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.