Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26590066›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2015

Development and process evaluation of an educational intervention for overdose prevention and naloxone distribution by general practice trainees.

Jan Klimas, Mairead Egan, Helen Tobin, Neil Coleman, Gerard Bury

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Opiate addiction and overdose: experiences, attitudes, and appetite for community naloxone provision.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan KlimasCentre for Emergency Medical Science, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. jan.klimas@ucd.ie.
Mairead EganCentre for Emergency Medical Science, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. mairead.egan@ucd.ie.
Helen TobinCentre for Emergency Medical Science, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. helen.tobin@ucd.ie.
Neil ColemanCentre for Emergency Medical Science, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. neil.coleman@ucd.ie.
Gerard BuryCentre for Emergency Medical Science, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. gerard.bury@ucd.ie.
University College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverdose is the most common cause of fatalities among opioid users. Naloxone is a life-saving medication for reversing opioid overdose. In Ireland, it is currently available to ambulance and emergency care services, but General Practitioners (GP) are in regular contact with opioid users and their families. This positions them to provide naloxone themselves or to instruct patients how to use it. The new Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Pre-hospital Emergency Care Council of Ireland allows trained bystanders to administer intranasal naloxone. We describe the development and process evaluation of an educational intervention, designed to help GP trainees identify and manage opioid overdose with intranasal naloxone.

methodsParticipants (N = 23) from one postgraduate training scheme in Ireland participated in a one-hour training session. The repeated-measures design, using the validated Opioid Overdose Knowledge (OOKS) and Attitudes (OOAS) Scales, examined changes immediately after training. Acceptability and satisfaction with training were measured with a self-administered questionnaire.

resultsKnowledge of the risks of overdose and appropriate actions to be taken increased significantly post-training [OOKS mean difference, 3.52 (standard deviation 4.45); P < 0.001]; attitudes improved too [OOAS mean difference, 11.13 (SD 6.38); P < 0.001]. The most and least useful delivery methods were simulation and video, respectively.

conclusionAppropriate training is a key requirement for the distribution of naloxone through general practice. In future studies, the knowledge from this pilot will be used to inform a train-the-trainer model, whereby healthcare professionals and other front-line service providers will be trained to instruct opioid users and their families in overdose prevention and naloxone use.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdministration, IntranasalAdultCaregiversDrug OverdoseEducation, Medical, GraduateFamilyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFriendsGeneral PracticeHealth EducationHumansIrelandMaleNaloxoneNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID26590066
PMCPMC4654915
OpenAlexW2172989148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.