Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26590029›Full record

ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2015

Biofilm formation affects surface properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.

Hong-Keun Hyun, Satin Salehi, Jack L Ferracane

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Influence of biofilm formation on the optical properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2016
    Article
  6. Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: AnJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hong-Keun HyunDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, 101, Daehakno, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-768, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: hege1@snu.ac.kr.
Satin SalehiDivision of Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, 2730 S.W. Moody Avenue, Portland, OR 97201, USA. Electronic address: salehi@ohsu.edu.
Jack L FerracaneDivision of Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, 2730 S.W. Moody Avenue, Portland, OR 97201, USA. Electronic address: ferracan@ohsu.edu.
Oregon Health & Science University · USSeoul National University Dental Hospital · KR

Funding

Effect of Bacteria and Mechanical Loading on Degradation of the Composite-Tooth IR01DE021372 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FERRACANE, JACK L. · 2010 to 2013
$2.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study investigated the effects of bacterial biofilm on the surface properties of novel bioactive glass (BAG)-containing composites of different initial surface roughness.

methodsBAG (65 mol% Si; 4% P; 31% Ca) and BAG-F (61% Si; 31% Ca; 4% P; 3% F; 1% B) were synthesized by the sol-gel method and micronized (size ∼0.1-10 μm). Composites with 72wt% total filler load were prepared by replacing 15% of the silanized Sr glass with BAG, BAG-F, or silanized silica. Specimens (n=10/group) were light-cured and divided into 4 subgroups of different surface roughness by wet polishing with 600 and then up to 1200, 2400, or 4000 grit SiC. Surface roughness (SR), gloss, and Knoop microhardness were measured before and after incubating in media with or without a Streptococcus mutans (UA 159) biofilm for 2 weeks. Results were analyzed with ANOVA/Tukey's test (α=0.05).

resultsThe SR of the BAG-containing composites with the smoothest surfaces (2400/4000 grit) increased in media or bacteria; the SR of the roughest composites (600 grit) decreased. The gloss of the smoothest BAG-containing composites decreased in bacteria and media-only, but more in media-alone. The microhardness of all of the composites decreased with exposure to media or bacteria, with BAG-containing composites affected more than the control. SIGNIFICANCE: Exposure to bacterial biofilm and its media produced enhanced roughness and reduced gloss and surface microhardness of highly polished dental composites containing a bioactive glass additive, which could affect further biofilm formation, as well as the esthetics, of restorations made from such a material.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionBiofilmsComposite ResinsDental MaterialsDental PolishingGlassHardnessMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningStreptococcus mutansSurface PropertiesComposite ResinsDental MaterialsBioactive glassBiofilmsDental compositesGlossMicrohardnessStreptococcus mutansSurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID26590029
PMCPMC4699808
OpenAlexW2181173727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.