Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26589824›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2016

Hypoxia-Targeting Fluorescent Nanobodies for Optical Molecular Imaging of Pre-Invasive Breast Cancer.

Aram S A van Brussel, Arthur Adams, Sabrina Oliveira, Bram Dorresteijn, Mohamed El Khattabi, Jeroen F Vermeulen, Elsken van der Wall, Willem P Th M Mali, Patrick W B Derksen, Paul J van Diest and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. NANOBODYInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Conjugation of IRDye Photosensitizers or Fluorophores to Nanobodies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Nanobodies Enhancing Cancer Visualization, Diagnosis and Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Nanobodies asRSC chemical biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Nanobodies in cancer.Seminars in immunology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aram S A van BrusselDivision of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Arthur AdamsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sabrina OliveiraDivision of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bram DorresteijnDivision of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mohamed El KhattabiQVQ BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeroen F VermeulenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elsken van der WallDivision of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem P Th M MaliDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Patrick W B DerksenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Paul M P van Bergen En HenegouwenDivision of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p.vanbergen@uu.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NLQserve Group (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this work was to develop a CAIX-specific nanobody conjugated to IRDye800CW for molecular imaging of pre-invasive breast cancer. PROCEDURES: CAIX-specific nanobodies were selected using a modified phage display technology, conjugated site-specifically to IRDye800CW and evaluated in a xenograft breast cancer mouse model using ductal carcinoma in situ cells (DCIS).

resultsSpecific anti-CAIX nanobodies were obtained. Administration of a CAIX-specific nanobody into mice with DCIS xenografts overexpressing CAIX showed after 2 h a mean tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (TNR) of 4.3 ± 0.6, compared to a TNR of 1.4 ± 0.2 in mice injected with the negative control nanobody R2-IR. In DCIS mice, a TNR of 1.8 ± 0.1 was obtained. Biodistribution studies demonstrated an uptake of 14.0 ± 1.1 %I.D./g in DCIS + CAIX tumors, 4.6 ± 0.8 %I.D./g in DCIS tumors, while 2.0 ± 0.2 %I.D./g was obtained with R2-IR.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate the successful generation of a CAIX-specific nanobody-IRDye800CW conjugate that can be used for rapid imaging of (pre-)invasive breast cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbonic Anhydrase IXCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCell HypoxiaCell Surface Display TechniquesDNAFemaleHeLa CellsHumansHypoxiaImmunizationImmunohistochemistryMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMiceMolecular ImagingNeoplasm InvasivenessCarbonic Anhydrase IXDNASingle-Domain AntibodiesBreast cancerCarbonic anhydrase IXMolecular fluorescence pathologyNanobodyOptical imagingVHH

Identifiers

PMID26589824
PMCPMC4927611
OpenAlexW2176571666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.