Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26589819›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of cardiology2016

Should Antihypertensive Treatment Recommendations Differ in Patients With and Without Coronary Heart Disease? (from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]).

Michael H Alderman, Barry R Davis, Linda B Piller, Charles E Ford, M Sarah Baraniuk, Sara L Pressel, Mahshid A Assadi, Paula T Einhorn, L Julian Haywood, Ekambaram Ilamathi and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Michael H AldermanDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Department of Medicine (General Internal Medicine), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Barry R DavisThe University of Texas School of Public Health, Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Houston, Texas.
Linda B PillerThe University of Texas School of Public Health, Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: Linda.B.Piller@uth.tmc.edu.
Charles E FordThe University of Texas School of Public Health, Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Houston, Texas.
M Sarah BaraniukThe University of Texas School of Public Health, Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Houston, Texas.
Sara L PresselThe University of Texas School of Public Health, Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Houston, Texas.
Mahshid A AssadiState University of New York Health Sciences Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York.
Paula T EinhornDivision of Prevention and Population Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
L Julian HaywoodLAC + USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Ekambaram IlamathiSuffolk Nephrology Consultants, Stony Brook, New York.
Suzanne OparilDepartment of Medicine and Physiology & Biophysics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Tamrat M RettaDepartment of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia.
ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USHoward University · USLAC+USC Medical Center · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USState University of New York · USSuffolk University · USThe Coordinating Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
CLINICAL TRIALS CENTER FOR ALLHAT-N01HC35130-268035130N01HC035130 · HC · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · 1993 to 2005
$6.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100036CNHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC035130NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-35130PHS HHS HHSN268201100036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thiazide-type diuretics have been recommended for initial treatment of hypertension in most patients, but should this recommendation differ for patients with and without coronary heart disease (CHD)? The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) was a randomized, double-blind hypertension treatment trial in 42,418 participants with high risk of combined cardiovascular disease (CVD) (25% with preexisting CHD). This post hoc analysis compares long-term major clinical outcomes in those assigned amlodipine (n = 9048) or lisinopril (n = 9,054) with those assigned chlorthalidone (n = 15,255), stratified by CHD status. After 4 to 8 years, randomized treatment was discontinued. Total follow-up (active treatment + passive surveillance using national databases for deaths and hospitalizations) was 8 to 13 years. For most CVD outcomes, end-stage renal disease, and total mortality, there were no differences across randomized treatment arms regardless of baseline CHD status. In-trial rates of CVD were significantly higher for lisinopril compared with chlorthalidone, and rates of heart failure were significantly higher for amlodipine compared with chlorthalidone in those with and without CHD (overall hazard ratios [HRs] 1.10, p <0.001, and 1.38, p <0.001, respectively). During extended follow-up, significant outcomes according to CHD status interactions (p = 0.012) were noted in amlodipine versus chlorthalidone comparison for CVD and CHD mortality (HR 0.88, p = 0.04, and 0.84, p = 0.04, respectively) in those with CHD at baseline (HR 1.06, p = 0.15, and 1.08, p = 0.17) and in those without. The results of the overall increased stroke mortality in lisinopril compared with chlorthalidone (HR 1.2; p = 0.03) and hospitalized heart failure in amlodipine compared with chlorthalidone (HR 1.12; p = 0.01) during extended follow-up did not differ by baseline CHD status. In conclusion, these results provide no reason to alter our previous recommendation to include a properly dosed diuretic (such as chlorthalidone 12.5 to 25 mg/day) in the initial antihypertensive regimen for most hypertensive patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsCoronary Artery DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodDyslipidemiasFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionLipidsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesAntihypertensive AgentsLipids

Identifiers

PMID26589819
PMCPMC4690772
OpenAlexW1792926587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.