Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26589786›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

Gains attained in malaria control coverage within settings earmarked for pre-elimination: malaria indicator and prevalence surveys 2012, Eritrea.

Araia Berhane, Selam Mihreteab, Hagos Ahmed, Assefash Zehaie, Usman Abdulmumini, Emmanuel Chanda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Araia BerhaneCommunicable Diseases and Control Division, Ministry of Health, Asmara, Eritrea. araiabm@gmail.com.
Selam MihreteabNational Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Asmara, Eritrea. selamino2001@yahoo.com.
Hagos AhmedNational Statistics Office, Asmara, Eritrea. hagahwo2005@gmail.com.
Assefash ZehaieWHO Eritrea Country Office, Asmara, Eritrea. zehaiea@who.int.
Usman AbdulmuminiWHO Eritrea Country Office, Asmara, Eritrea. usmanaeri@yahoo.com.
Emmanuel ChandaVector Control Specialist/Consultant, Lusaka, Zambia. emmanuel_chanda@yahoo.co.uk.
University of Asmara · ER

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEritrea, like most countries in sub-Saharan Africa, has expended much effort towards malaria control with the view of transitioning from reduction of the disease burden to elimination. This paper reports on the level of achievement as highlighted by the follow-on, malaria-endemic area representative, survey that aimed to provide data and to assess progress on malaria indicators and parasite prevalence at household level across the country.

methodsIn 2012, data were collected using a two-stage stratified cluster random sample of 1887 households in 96 clusters (villages in rural areas and census enumeration areas in urban centers) during a malaria indicator and prevalence survey in Eritrea. The survey determined parasite prevalence in vulnerable population groups and evaluated coverage, use and access to malaria control services. Standardized Roll-Back Malaria Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group household and women's questionnaires were adapted to the local situation and used for collection of data that were analysed and summarized using descriptive statistics.

resultsThe results of the survey showed that 90% (95% CI 89-91) of households owned at least one mosquito net. The proportion of the population with access to an insecticide-treated net (ITN) in their household was 55% (95% CI 54-56). The utilization of ITNs was 67% (95% CI 65-70) for children under 5 years and 60% (95% CI 58-63) for pregnant women (OR: 0. 73(95% CI 0.62-0.85); P = 0.52). Only 28% (95% CI 26-30) of households were covered by indoor residual spraying (IRS) the previous year with significant heterogeneity by zoba (Debub 50 % (95% CI 45-54) vs Gash Barka 32 % (95% CI 28-36); OR = 0. 47 (95% CI 0.36-0.61), P = 0.05). Malaria parasite prevalence was low; 1.1% (95% CI 0.9-1.3) in the general population and 1.4% (95% CI 1.0-2.0) in children under five and 0.7% (95% CI 0.4-1.1) among women aged 15-49 years. Only 19% (95% CI 15-26) of children under five had fever in the 2 weeks preceding the survey, with 61% (95% CI 54.1-67.1) seeking treatment from a health facility. Data on knowledge levels show that 92% reported that malaria is transmitted by mosquitoes, 92% mentioned that the use of mosquito nets could prevent malaria, 47% knew malaria prevention medication, 83% cited fever as a sign and symptom of malaria, and 35% had heard or seen malaria awareness messages.

conclusionNotwithstanding confounders, the observed low malaria parasite prevalence could be associated with malaria intervention coverage, access and utilization as well as high and equitable knowledge levels in the population. This indicates that Eritrea is on the right track towards pre-elimination. However, technical and infrastructure capacity should be strengthened to facilitate implementation, surveillance, monitoring, and evaluation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChild, PreschoolCommunicable Disease ControlDisease Transmission, InfectiousEritreaFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalariaMaleMiddle AgedPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26589786
PMCPMC4654824
OpenAlexW2177573584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.