ReviewCell communication and signaling : CCS2015
Short linear motifs - ex nihilo evolution of protein regulation.
Review in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
133 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovering host-viral protein interactions in autophagy: A LIR discovery pipeline for identifying LC3-interacting region motifs in highly virulent viruses.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Short linear motifs-underexplored players drivingMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- The evolutionary origins of streptophyte multicellularity.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Evolutionarily conserved short linear motifs drive actin filament binding.Nature cell biology · 2026Article
- Pathogenic variations illuminate functional constraints in intrinsically disordered proteins.iScience · 2026Article
- A proteome-wide dependency map of protein interaction motifs.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026Article
- Evolutionary turnover of key amino acids explains conservation of function without conservation of sequence in transcriptional activation domains.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Sequence and chemical specificity define the functional landscape of intrinsically disordered regions.Nature cell biology · 2026Article
- Transcription start site aware catalogue of microRNA encoded peptides in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum).Discover plants · 2026Article
- Article
- Non-covalent SUMO interactions with ligases and effectors: SUMO-interacting motifs and beyond.Essays in biochemistry · 2025Review
- Structural insights and biophysical characterization of p90RSK2:ERK2 complex.The Biochemical journal · 2025Article
- Evolution of a fuzzy ribonucleoprotein complex in viral assembly.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Accurate affinity models for SH2 domains from peptide binding assays and free-energy regression.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Enhancing cross-domain protein and peptide interaction with retrained deep learning models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- High-throughput investigation of cyclin docking interactions reveals the complexity of motif binding determinants.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Recent progress and future challenges in structure-based protein-protein interaction prediction.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- SHARK-capture identifies functional motifs in intrinsically disordered protein regions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Diverse genetic conflicts mediated by molecular mimicry and computational approaches to detect them.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025Review
- Cell signaling inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Short sequence motifs are ubiquitous across the three major types of biomolecules: hundreds of classes and thousands of instances of DNA regulatory elements, RNA motifs and protein short linear motifs (SLiMs) have been characterised. The increase in complexity of transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation in higher Eukaryotes has coincided with a significant expansion of motif use. But how did the eukaryotic cell acquire such a vast repertoire of motifs? In this review, we curate the available literature on protein motif evolution and discuss the evidence that suggests SLiMs can be acquired by mutations, insertions and deletions in disordered regions. We propose a mechanism of ex nihilo SLiM evolution - the evolution of a novel SLiM from "nothing" - adding a functional module to a previously non-functional region of protein sequence. In our model, hundreds of motif-binding domains in higher eukaryotic proteins connect simple motif specificities with useful functions to create a large functional motif space. Accessible peptides that match the specificity of these motif-binding domains are continuously created and destroyed by mutations in rapidly evolving disordered regions, creating a dynamic supply of new interactions that may have advantageous phenotypic novelty. This provides a reservoir of diversity to modify existing interaction networks. Evolutionary pressures will act on these motifs to retain beneficial instances. However, most will be lost on an evolutionary timescale as negative selection and genetic drift act on deleterious and neutral motifs respectively. In light of the parallels between the presented model and the evolution of motifs in the regulatory segments of genes and (pre-)mRNAs, we suggest our understanding of regulatory networks would benefit from the creation of a shared model describing the evolution of transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.